Human Rights - Judgment Search Results

Manipur Human Rights Commission Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court: Guwahati

of Sub-section (5) of Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, it is clear that a duty is Sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 wherein and whereunder decision of the Human Rights

M.P. Human Rights Commission Through Registrar (Law) Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2002MP239; 2002(3)MPHT502

forget the saying 'Yatra Nariyast Pujyante, Ramante Tatra Devatah'.17. A human right for woman has to be perceived in the collective petition has been filed for protection and promotion of human rights of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 under the Act.

M.P. Human Rights Commission Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2003MP17; 2002(4)MPLJ321

remedial measures; (f) study treaties and other international instrument on human rights and make recommendation for their effective implementation; (g) undertake ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The M.P. Human Rights Commission (for short 'the Commission') through its Registrar has visited

South Asia Human Rights Documentation Trust & Others vs.suhas Chakma & ...

Court: Delhi

Human Rights Documentation Trust (SAHRDT) (The TRUST) and South Asia Human Rights Documentation Private Limited (SAHRD Pvt. Ltd.) (Company), with a trust on 11.03.2003. It was urged that South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (SAHRDC) (the Centre), South Asia Human Rights Documentation

National Human Rights Commission Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)442; AIR1996SC1234; JT1996(1)SC163; 1996(4)KarLJ225; 1996(1)SCALE155; (1996)1SCC742; [1996]1SCR278; 1996(1)LC370(SC)

Court, the Chakmas have 'raised a bogey of violation of human rights.'12. The first respondent has filed a counter to the the Chakmas have 'raised a bogey of violation of human rights.'12. The first respondent has filed a counter to the stand

Common Wealth Human Rights Initiative Vs. Kailash Prakash and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(1996)ACC633; 1996IIAD(Delhi)596; 62(1996)DLT605

attention to progress and set back in various fields of human rights; that the plaintiff appointed defendant No. 1 vide its August, 1993 for the use of the Director, Commonwealth Human Rights as the Director of Chri, defendant No. 1 has been

National Human Rights Commission and Others vs.anil Kumar Joshi and An ...

Court: Delhi

The National Human Rights Commission has been constituted under the Human Rights Act, 1993. Anil Kumar Joshi was appointed as a National Human Rights Commission has been constituted under the Human Rights Act, 1993. Anil Kumar Joshi was appointed as a Junior

National Human Rights Commission Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(7)SCALE336a; (2002)10SCC476

had made comprehensive recommendations for amendments in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 and which are under consideration of the has been placed before us made by the National Human Rights Commission stating, inter alia, that it had made comprehensive recommendations

Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell Bmrws (Regd.) Bhel Mig 982 a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The appeals are filed by the Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell on behalf of the individual second appellant and he/she filed the appeals through the Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell which is the first appellant. The

South Asian Human Rights Documentation Centre & Ors vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

that he was the Managing Trustee-cum-Director of Asian Centre for Human Rights (in short ACHR).... Petitioner No.1 South Asia Human Rights January, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4111/2011 & Crl.M.A. 501/2015 SOUTH ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION CENTRE & ORS ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Jawahar