Human Rights - Judgment Search Results

National Human Rights Commission Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)2GLR1672(SC); JT2009(6)SC405; 2009(6)SCALE509; (2009)6SCC342

as impartial and independent adjudicators.36. The principles of rule of law and due process are closely linked with human rights protection. Such rights can be protected effectively when a citizen has recourse to the courts of law. It … violence can be brought to book.9. Vide an order dated 8th August 2003 in the matter of National Human Rights Commission v. State of Gujarat,, this Court regretted that 'no law has yet been enacted, not even a

National Human Rights Commission Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)442; AIR1996SC1234; JT1996(1)SC163; 1996(4)KarLJ225; 1996(1)SCALE155; (1996)1SCC742; [1996]1SCR278; 1996(1)LC370(SC)

interest petition, being a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the National Human Rights Commission (hereinafter called 'NHRC') and seeks to enforce the rights, under Article 21 of the Constitution, of about … the second respondent is the Union of India.2. The NHRC has been set up under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (No. 10 of 1994). Section 18 of this Act empowers the NHRC to approach this Court

National Human Rights Commission Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(7)SCALE336a; (2002)10SCC476

ORDER1. A statement has been placed before us made by the National Human Rights Commission stating, inter alia, that it had made comprehensive recommendations for amendments in the Protection of Human Rights … Human Rights Commission stating, inter alia, that it had made comprehensive recommendations for amendments in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 and which are under consideration of the Government of India for taking further steps. 2. In

National Human Rights Commission vs.central Information Commission & A ...

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 349/2015 & CM Appln. No.554/2015 NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Through: Ms. Shobha and Ms. Joyshree versus Barman, Advocates. ........ Petitioner CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR. Through: … is to inform that Case No.197/18/5/2011 was registered on complaint dated 20/01/2011 received through Sh. Siba Sankar Patro, Human Rights Defender in respect of Sushant Kumar Sahu & Trinath Sahu. The Commission after considering the matter on 17/02/2011

Fight for Human Rights vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.10285/2016 Date of decision :1. t September, 2017 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through : Ms. K.R. Chitra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS

National Human Rights Commission vs.central Information Commission & O ...

Court: Delhi

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 390/2015 NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Shobha and Ms Joyshree Barman, Advocates. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ORS. ........

Common Wealth Human Rights Initiative vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8978/2015 % Date of decision :6. h February, 2018 COMMON WEALTH HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kushdeep Gaur and Mr. Vardaan, Advs. … States/ districts, and they shall be selected by the State government from a panel prepared by the State Human Rights Commission/ Lok Ayukta/ State Public Service Commission. The panel may include members from amongst retired civil the volume

South Asia Human Rights Documentation Trust & Others vs.suhas Chakma & ...

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :15. h DECEMBER, 2017 IA64252015 in CS(OS) 840/2006 SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION TRUST & OTHERS ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Jawahar Raja and Mr.Chinmay Kanojia, Advocates versus SUHAS CHAKMA & … objections was that the plaintiffs were not owners of the copyright and it belonged to the South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter ‘the Company’) as such the suit was not maintainable. Issues were framed on

Universal Human Rights Commission vs.commissioner-mcd and Ors.

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10051/2017 % Date of decision :19. h February, 2018 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER-MCD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.

Fight for Human Rights vs.union of India

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)11523/2016 % Date of Decision:17. h January, 2018 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through: Mr. K.R. Chitra, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth,