Skip to content


However - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: however Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 13,093 results (0.235 seconds)
Jan 04 2007 (TRI)

Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-04-2007

Reported in: (2007)(117)ECC257

..... transaction value appearing in section 4 these two elements are required to be given deductions however the commissioner has rejected their pleas and has held that both the elements are required .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 2007 (TRI)

Excel FIn Cap Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-01-2007

Reported in: (2007)10STJ135CESTAT(Bang.)alore

..... and for the commission or the brokerage received they have been paying the service tax however two other elements namely handling charges and terminal charges were charged from investors the said .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 2007 (TRI)

Skf Boilers and Driers Private Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-04-2007

Reported in: (2007)11STJ95CESTAT(Bang.)alore

..... had filed an application for recall of the interim order passed by the commissioner a however he has not taken the said application into consideration and has dismissed the appeal for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2007 (TRI)

Padmini Polymers Ltd. and Shri Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2007

Reported in: (2007)(119)ECC171

..... specifically software for telecom medical or other applications is not eligible for exemption from duty however software containing encyclopedia games books etc will be eligible for the exemption wherever they satisfy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 2007 (TRI)

Nestle India Ltd. Vs. Cst

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-07-2007

Reported in: (2007)8STR296

..... the period september 2002 to march 2003 which has been duly accepted by the commissioner however as per the reply furnished by the appellant before the commissioner the figures furnished is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 2007 (TRI)

Ambika Nahar Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: May-04-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC267

..... 07 11 2001 against that order the appellant went to hon ble calcutta high court however the hon ble court remanded the matter to the tribunal by order dated 14 02 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2007 (TRI)

Parvenu Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-03-2007

Reported in: (2007)(119)ECC369

..... 3 after considering the submissions we are impressed with the argument advanced by ld counsel however at this stage we are not embarking on further interpretation of the notification suffice to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2007 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Uniflex Industries (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-27-2007

Reported in: (2007)(119)ECC388

..... excise duty on the lay flat tubing from 2 6 98 to 13 6 98 however in view of the exemption under notification dated 2 6 98 a refund claim for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2007 (TRI)

Spandrel Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Apr-26-2007

Reported in: (2007)11STJ130CESTAT(Bang.)alore

..... the term commercial or industrial construction services the appellants have a strong case on merits however offer given to pre deposit rs 10 00 000 rupees ten lakhs only is accepted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 2007 (TRI)

Harayana Sheet Glass Ltd., K.S. Vs. C.C. and C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: May-07-2007

Reported in: (2007)(120)ECC70

..... recommendations of the development commissioner were goods eligible for the benefit of the exemption notification however this amendment did not impugne entry nos 5 or and 7 in the said list .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //