However - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: however Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 10,957 results (0.255 seconds)M/S. Marson'S Ltd. Vs. Cce, Kolkata-i
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jan-01-2001
..... tribunal s decision in the case of j r engg works 2000 122 elt 514 however in the absence of the nature of the discrepancies made the basis for rejecting the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Liquid Controls (India) Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise a ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
..... it cannot be said that the benefit of doubt was available to them this ground however would be of assistance to shri patel on his arguments as to the liability to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Mo Engineering Pvt. Limited, Vs. Cce, New Delhi
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2001
..... given to the party for personal hearing is not relevant for the present it is however noted on the face of the record that in the appeal filed by the party .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Chenab Textile Mills, Kathua Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2001
..... fact which requires to be gone into in detail at the final stage of hearing however i note that at least in some of these six cases penalty has been imposed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Bata India Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT62Tri(Bang.)
..... the present case falls under 173q 1 a thus men rea not be called for however there is admittedly no revenue loss nor have the appellants acted in a countermacious disregard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTispat Profiles India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT338Tri(Mum.)bai
..... that factory where the ingots are produced the exemption benefit will be available that is however clearly a misinterpretation the reference to the factory of production in the notification is obviously .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Sandur Laminates Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT107Tri(Bang.)
..... manufactured goods warehousing chapter will not apply to goods produced or manufactured in 100 eou however the provision of chapter iii would apply rule 100a 2 stipulates that the provisions of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentury Textiles and Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
..... the goods was by a process not amount to manufacture could be of significance here however the basis of assessment is not the weight of the yarn but the value i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Wox Coolers P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-23-2001
..... 95 28 9 95 5 10 95 but could not be held as these dates however the same was held on 31 10 95 shri s n kapoor advocate and shri .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKantilal Govindbhai Sagar Gold Vs. Commissioner of Customs(Prev),
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-2001
Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT809Tri(Mum.)bai
..... been cancelled invalidated or made inoperative till the date of importation of the machines he however says that the machines had been sold to master link in contravention of the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial