However - Year 2000 - Judgments

Jan 05 2000 (TRI)

Elgitread (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-05-2000

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC352

..... both the counsels had to come from two different places namely madras and new delhi however their request was neither considered nor mentioned in the order therefore they are aggrieved with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2000 (TRI)

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Economic Pharmaceuticals (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC488

..... that the product in dispute is an ayurvedic medicament under cet sub heading 3003 30 however this is not sufficient for treating the product as ayurvedic medicament particularly when criterion laid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2000 (TRI)

Goyal TIn Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-31-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT525TriDel

..... income tax department hence the credit is rightly disallowed by the assistant commissioner he has however allowed the modvat credit where the duplicate copy for the invoice did not bear the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2000 (TRI)

Paras Prints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-30-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT662Tri(Mum.)bai

..... done advocate for the appellant has not denied the factual correctness of this inclusion he however opposes the demand for duty on the ground that the extended period will not be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2000 (TRI)

Tata Exports Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-26-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT472Tri(Mum.)bai

..... drawback if the department was of the view that it had been wrongly claimed it however explained that it had described the goods correctly and therefore confiscation and penalty were not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Jayana Times Industries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-26-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT514TriDel

..... not entitled to the benefit of this notification which applied only to the watch components however the commissioner appeals had reversed the order of the assistant collector by holding that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Vellathal Spinning Mills Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-26-2000

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT767Tri(Chennai)

..... the date of finalisation of the provisional assessment and payment of duty on that basis however by explanation e which was introduced on 20 9 1991 to the said section the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2000 (TRI)

Refco and Wessamat Appliances Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT493TriDel

..... out to rs 8 58 900 this demand thus has to be confirmed on merits however the ld counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant should get the benefit of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Control Tech Electronics

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-26-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT369TriDel

..... confirmed by the assistant collector through the order in original dated 15 6 1993 they however challenged that order of the assistant collector in appeal and the collector appeals set aside .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2000 (TRI)

Jamuna Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-31-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT441TriDel

..... has taken note of the receipt of above stated intimation in his order he has however observed that as per rule 57t 2 a manufacturer intending to take credit of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

However - Judgment Search Results