Hosiery - Judgment Search Results

Ramu Hosieries, Re. by Its Sole Proprietor Mr. M. Marugeshan Vs. Ramu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(2)CTC230

appellant is the registered proprietor of a number of registered trade marks including the trade mark 'Ramu' for hosiery, bearing No.332829 in Class 25 with effect from 27.7.1978. The appellant has been using the trade mark 'Ramu'

Workmen of Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors. Vs. Common ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1958KAR206; (1960)ILLJ143Kant

Matched in: Parties Workmen of Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors. Vs. Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors.

Shree Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bhagalpur Municipa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1991(5)SC394; 1991(2)SCALE1442; 1992Supp(1)SCC588; [1991]Supp3SCR506

in Second Appeal No. 164 of 1988 and Second Appeal No. 165 of 1988. The appellant Shree Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd., being owner of Municipal holding Nos. 69,70 and 71 situated on the Central Jail Road

West Bengal Hosiery Association and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1988(36)BLJR783; (1989)1CALLT9(SC); JT1988(3)SC347; 1988(2)SCALE280; (1988)4SCC134a; [1988]Supp2SCR378; [1988]71STC298(SC); 1988(2)LC614(SC)

J.1. This writ petition is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the West Bengal Hosiery Association and certain Hosiery manufacturers and dealers in the State of West Bengal against the State of Bihar

Tarzan Hosiery (P) Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC2195; [1977(35)FLR244]; 1977LabIC1535; (1977)4SCC606

Matched in: Parties Tarzan Hosiery (P) Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Hindustan Hosiery Industries Vs. F.H. Lala and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC526; [1974(28)FLR213]; (1974)ILLJ340SC; (1974)4SCC316; [1974]3SCR302; 1974(1)SLJ258(SC)

partnership firm which was constituted and commenced production in April 1967. The firm manufactures and sells nylon and hosiery goods such as socks, undergarments, and the like. It is registered with the Maharashtra State Directorate of Industries

Jaipur Hosiery Mills (P) Ltd., Jaipur Vs. the State of Rajasthan and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1330; (1970)2SCC26; [1997]1SCR396; [1970]26STC341(SC)

interpreted to mean that the goods manufactured by the appellants were not garments within its meaning. M/s. Pareek Hosiery Products, Jaipur, took the matter to the High Court by way of a writ petition under Article 226

Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd and Anr. Vs. Textile Committee and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

ORDER WP No.1732 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BISWANATH HOSIERY MILLS LTD & ANR. Versus TEXTILE COMMITTEE & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date: 5th May, 2016

Garment and Hosiery Udyog Karmchari Union and ors. Vs. State of U.P. a ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(3)AWC3124

Matched in: Parties Garment and Hosiery Udyog Karmchari Union and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Mhow Hosiery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jitendra

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2005(106)FLR889]; 2005(3)MPHT279

ORDERS.K. Gangele, J.1. These are the bunch of the petitions filed by the petitioner M/s. Mhow Hosiery Pvt. Ltd. against the common order passed by the Industrial Court allowing the appeals of the respondents workers.2.