Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Hose - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 2001

A.P. Hosing Board Vs. Yelda Ramulu (Died) by Lr and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-19-2001

Reported in: 2002(5)ALD663; 2002(5)ALT356

Ramesh Madhav Bapat, J. 1. A.S.No.1848 of 1993 was filed by the beneficiary i.e., A.P. Housing Board, represented by its Executive Engineer. The said appeal was dismissed by the Bench presided over by the Hon'ble Mr....


Jun 18 1992

Hosing Ardasar Ichhaporiya Vs. Mahavir General Hospital and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-18-1992

Reported in: (1993)2GLR1394; (1994)IILLJ326Guj

Mehta, J. 1. The petitioner-workman is aggrieved by the order of the Labour Court, permitting the respondent-management to appear through Shri G.M. Vakil (a practicing Advocate) as an officer of the Southern Gujarat Chamber of Commerce...


Jan 30 2004

Markwell Hose Industries Pvt. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-30-2004

Reported in: (2005)98TTJ(Mum.)403

union settlement.3. Briefly, the material facts. The assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing hydraulic rubber hose pipes for industrial appliances. The manufacturing unit of the assessee is located in District Medak in Andhra Pradesh.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 24 1992

Aerolex Hose (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-24-1992

Reported in: (1993)LC389Tri(Chennai)

dated 31-7-1990 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Madras ordering confiscation of a part consignment of rubber hoses, but allowing redemption on payment of a fine of Rs. 3,500/-. The facts of the case are that


Feb 20 1996

Madras Hydraulic Hose Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Feb-20-1996

Reported in: (1996)(86)ELT327Tri(Chennai)

covered under Item 685 (F) of the Appendix 3, Part A of the Policy, wherein only pipes and hoses are mentioned and not tubes.As a result, the Learned Collector has imposed penalty of Rs. 1 lakh under


Apr 27 1998

Cce Vs. Hydraulic Hose (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-27-1998

Reported in: (1998)(77)LC499Tri(Chennai)

description of the product, I find that loose braidings cannot be identified independently as parts of flexible steel hose pipes, they are of different size and serve the purpose of giving additional strength to the pipes which


Apr 28 1998

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Hydraulic Hose (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-28-1998

Reported in: (1998)(102)ELT168TriDel

description of the product, I find that loose braidings cannot be identified independently as parts of flexible steel hose pipes; they are of different size and serve the purpose of giving additional strength to the pipes which


Nov 30 1988

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Aerolex Hose Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-1988

Reported in: (1989)(20)LC430Tri(Delhi)

respondents company has prayed for substituting the respondents as stated in the impugned order namely from M/s. Aerolex Hose Industries to Aerolex Hose Pvt. Ltd. There being no opposition from the learned SDR misc.application is allowed with


Jan 01 1989

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Aerolex Hose Pvt. Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-1989

Reported in: (1989)(39)ELT681TriDel

respondents company has prayed for substituting the respondents as stated in the impugned order namely from M/s. Aerolex Hose Industries to Aerolex Hose Pvt. Ltd. There being no opposition from the learned SDR misc.application is allowed with


Nov 22 1994

Collector of Central Ex. Vs. Aerolex Hose Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-22-1994

Reported in: (1995)(79)ELT711TriDel

form of a certificate No. AT/TC/88/DRP, dated 26th May, 1988 issued by the Rubber Board in respect of hose sample sent by them for testing and the certificate indicates that it was made of vulcanised rubber (hardened).This


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial