Horses - Judgment Search Results
Goodenough Horse Shoe Mfg. Co. Vs. R. I. Horse Shoe Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-05-1877
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. Page 154 U. S. 636 The Rhode Island Horseshoe Company, a citizen of Rhode Island, sued the Goodenough Horseshoe Manufacturing Company, a citizen of New York, in
Vel White Horse Distellries Pvt. Ltd., Reptd. by Its Managing Director ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD189
by the impugned Government Order, G.O.Ms. No. 552, dated 1-7-1997, the Government exempted the third respondent M/s. White Horse Distilleries from obtaining various certificates from various authorities and as a consequence thereof, the second respondent who is
White Horse Communication Network Rep. by Its Managing Partner R. Raje ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: (2006)4MLJ1297
ORDERD. Murugesan. J. 1. The issue raised in all these writ petitions and writ appeals are common for the disposal of both the writ petitions and writ appeals. We refer the averments made in the writ...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Images Consumer Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs.horse Shoe Retail Holding pvt.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
Dec 10, Jan 11, Feb 11. We did not receive bills for Sept. & Nov. amount pending under horseshoe retail holdings Pvt. Ltd. is Rs.73,000/-. For V&B, we have cleared payments for Feb 10, March 10, May
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, A.P., Hyderabad Vs. White Hors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD739; 2000(1)ALT417
The facts pertaining to the case fall under a narrow compass:The petitioner is a proprietor of M/s. White Horse Distilleries. He was granted D2 licence under Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules, 1970 (for short 'Distillery Rules') on 25-7-1977
American Express Co. Vs. United States Horse Shoe Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-21-1917
of various classes of animals, fixing a primary valuation for each class; for instance: "For . . . horses . . . $100. Page 244 U. S. 61 For . . . colts . . . $50."
Ward Vs. Race Horse
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-25-1896
Ward v. Race Horse - 163 U.S. 504 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Ward v. Race Horse, 163 U.S. 504 (1896) Ward v.
M/S.I-Horse Technologies Pvt Ltd vs Regional Provident Fund Commission ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and WMP.No.3704 of 2025 M/s.I-Horse Technologies Pvt Ltd., Rep.by its Chairman and CEO Mr.S.Kaundeya Old No.374, New No.388, Vazhudhavur Main Road...
M/S.Blue Horse Granites Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-31-2011
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to execute the lease agreement in respect of granite bearing patta lands measuring 1.03.0 hectares, comprised...
K. Abdul Azeez Sahib and Sons, Four Horse Beedi Manufacturers and ors. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-08-1972
Reported in: (1973)2MLJ126
for manufacture of beedis ; that it has been marketing beedis under the registered trade marks ' Four Horse ', ' No. 10 Beedis ', and ' Pigeon Beedis', that the petitioner manufactures beedis under what is
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free