Home Office - Judgment Search Results

Home Office (Appellant) Vs. Tariq (Respondent) and Home Office (Respon ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

to the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660). The Home Office's case is that there was no such discrimination, that the decisions taken in relation to Mr Tariq were … national security, and that the order for a closed material procedure made by the Employment Tribunal (on the Home Office's application) on 15 February 2008 was made justifiably and for the same protective purposes. 3. Mr Tariq's challenge

Watkins (Respondent) Vs. Home Office (Appellants) and Others

Court: House of Lords

so, in what circumstances? Those are the questions which the House must resolve in this appeal by the Home Office, which is the first defendant in these proceedings. There were originally fourteen other defendants in the action, but … correspondence to or from a person other than the prisoner concerned, his legal adviser or a court." A Home Office instruction (113/1995, 21 December 1995) to prison governors required them to protect such correspondence against inadvertent or deliberate

St. theresa's Tender Loving Care Home rep. by Its Chief Co-ordinator V ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(4)ALT54

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.INTRODUCTION1. St. Theresa's Tender Loving Care Home (hereafter called, TLH) filed instant writ petition aggrieved by an order of Chairperson, Board of Control and Supervision … 50% of cases in in-country adoptions by giving children to adoptive parents including Government employees, businessmen, lawyers, police officers etc. Simultaneously if the children are rejected for in-country adoption, petitioner processed those cases for inter-country adoption. As