Holds - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: holds Page 1 of about 636 results (0.034 seconds)Blankenship Vs. Holding
Court: US Supreme Court
- 387 U.S. 95 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court BLANKENSHIP v. HOLDING, 387 U.S. 95 (1967) 387 U.S. 95 BLANKENSHIP ET AL.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolding Vs. Blankenship
Court: US Supreme Court
v. BLANKENSHIP - 387 U.S. 94 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court HOLDING v. BLANKENSHIP, 387 U.S. 94 (1967) 387 U.S. 94 HOLDING,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVenkataramana Holdings Private Limited Vs. Pricol Holdings Limited
Court: Chennai
is appended as Annexure '6' to the petition. 2. M/s.Venkataramana Holdings Private Limited is the transferor company and M/s.Pricol Holdings Limited
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWharf (Holdings) Ltd. Vs. United Int'l Holdings, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. v. United Int'l Holdings, Inc. - 532 U.S. 588 (2001) OCTOBER TERM, 2000 Syllabus
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT
the general meetings of this company; 2. when it alone holds the majority of the voting rights in this company pursuant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahindra Holdings and Finance Vs. Dcit and Ito
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
India are not necessarily the Trusts. The assessee, M/s. Mahindra Holding & Finance Ltd. has not clarified this position. 5. Therefore,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarcus Brown Holding Co., Inc. Vs. Feldman
Court: US Supreme Court
recover such possession upon the ground that the person is holding over and is objectionable, . . . or an action
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLok Holdings and Constructions Ltd. Vs. Housing Development and Improv ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR23
been arrived at on the basis of that, although Lok Holding was assigning its 50% share in the said Versova Property,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStock Holding Corporation of India Ltd. and Another Vs. Bharat Petrole ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1998]91CompCas862(Bom)
shares. It also makes it obligatory on a person who holds beneficial interest in a share or class of share of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiddharth Holding Pvt. Ltd. a Company Registered Under the Companies A ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2004(2)ALLMR232; 2003(6)BomCR857
The Appellate Court then examined the discrepancy with regard to holding of shares of the Disputant Nos. 1 & 6 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>