Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Holder Forth - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 15 2009

Nijhawan Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-15-2009

Nijhawan v. Holder - 08-495 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NIJHAWAN V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NIJHAWAN v … us is whether the italicized language refers to an element of the fraud or deceit “offense” as set forth in the particular fraud or deceit statute defining the offense of which the alien was previously convicted. If


Mar 03 2009

Negusie Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-2009

Negusie v. Holder - 07-499 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NEGUSIE V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NEGUSIE v … United States , 498 U. S. 395 , 407 (1991)). Both statutes were enacted to reflect principles set forth in international agreements, but the principles differ in significant respects. As discussed, Congress enacted the DPA in 1948


Jun 17 2010

Holder Vs. Humanitarian Law Project

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-2010

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project - 08-1498 (2010) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2009 HOLDER V. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT SUPREME COURT … “[m]ere speculation of harm does not constitute a compelling state interest”). II For the reasons I have set forth, I believe application of the statute as the Government interprets it would gravely and without adequate justification injure


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2009

Nken Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-22-2009

Nken v. Holder - 08-681 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NKEN V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NKEN v … Illegal Im- migration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), which “repealed the old judicial-review scheme set forth in [8 U. S. C.] §1105a [(1994 ed.),] and instituted a new (and significantly more restrictive) one in


Dec 12 2011

Judulang Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-2011

Judulang v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with


Jan 19 2010

Kucana Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-19-2010

Kucana v. Holder - 08-911 (2010) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2009 KUCANA V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KUCANA v


Jan 18 2012

Golan Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-18-2012

Golan v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with


May 21 2012

Holder Vs. Martinez Gutierrez

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-21-2012

Holder v. Gutierrez; Holder v. Sawyers NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is


Mar 28 2012

Vartelas Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-2012

Vartelas v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with


Apr 23 2013

Moncrieffe Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-23-2013

Moncrieffe v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with … The Government also cites , which provides that the Government need not “negative any exemption or exception set forth” in the CSA, and instead “the burden of going forward with the evidence with respect to any such


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial