Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Holder For Value - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 15 2009

Nijhawan Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-15-2009

Nijhawan v. Holder - 08-495 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NIJHAWAN V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NIJHAWAN v … Stat. Ann. §§13-1802 (West 1989), 13-2109 (West 2000) ($25,000); but see, e.g. , §§13-2103 (receipt of anything of value by fraudulent use of a credit card), 13-2204 (defrauding secured creditors), 13-2205 (defrauding judgment creditors), 13-2206 (West 1989)


Mar 03 2009

Negusie Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-2009

Negusie v. Holder - 07-499 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NEGUSIE V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NEGUSIE v … in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), §101, 66 Stat. 166, as added by Refugee Act of 1980, §201(a), 94 Stat. 102-103, 8 U. S. C. §1101(a)(42). This so-called “persecutor bar”


Jun 17 2010

Holder Vs. Humanitarian Law Project

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-2010

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project - 08-1498 (2010) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2009 HOLDER V. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT SUPREME COURT … conduct,” Brief for Plaintiffs 51, can further terrorism by foreign groups in multiple ways. “Material support” is a valuable resource by definition. Such support frees up other resources within the organization that may be put to violent


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2009

Nken Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-22-2009

Nken v. Holder - 08-681 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 NKEN V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NKEN v … an alien pending the court’s decision on the petition, unless the court orders otherwise.” §1252(b)(3)(B) (2006 ed.) (emphasis added). In addition, “many provisions of IIRIRA are aimed at protecting the Executive’s discretion from the courts.” Reno v.


Dec 12 2011

Judulang Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-2011

Judulang v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with


Jan 19 2010

Kucana Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-19-2010

Kucana v. Holder - 08-911 (2010) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2009 KUCANA V. HOLDER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KUCANA v … certain rules, earlier prescribed by the Attorney General, that govern the process of reopening removal proceedings. IIRIRA also added a provision stating that no court has jurisdiction to review any action of the Attorney General “the authority


Jan 18 2012

Golan Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-18-2012

Golan v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with … in United States district court, and shall reflect any harm to the actual or potential market for or value of the restored work from the reliance party’s continued exploitation of the work, as well as compensation for


May 21 2012

Holder Vs. Martinez Gutierrez

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-21-2012

Holder v. Gutierrez; Holder v. Sawyers NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is … ‘admitted’ mean, with respect to an alien, the lawful entry of the alien into the United States” (emphasis added)); §1101(a)(33) (“The term ‘residence’ means the place of general abode; the place of general abode of a person


Mar 28 2012

Vartelas Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-2012

Vartelas v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with … legal regime, not a past act that he is helpless to undo.” 548 U. S., at 44 (emphasis added). Vartelas, we have several times stressed, engaged in no criminal activity after IIRIRA’s passage. He simply took a


Apr 23 2013

Moncrieffe Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-23-2013

Moncrieffe v. Holder NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with … a misdemeanor “[n]otwithstanding paragraph (1)(D)” when only “a small amount of marihuana for no remuneration” is involved. (Emphasis added.) The CSA’s text makes neither provision the default. Rather, each is drafted to be exclusive of the other.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial