Hold Over - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: hold over Page 1 of about 636 results (0.051 seconds)Blankenship Vs. Holding
Court: US Supreme Court
- 387 U.S. 95 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court BLANKENSHIP v. HOLDING, 387 U.S. 95 (1967) 387 U.S. 95 BLANKENSHIP ET AL.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolding Vs. Blankenship
Court: US Supreme Court
HOLDING v. BLANKENSHIP - 387 U.S. 94 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVenkataramana Holdings Private Limited Vs. Pricol Holdings Limited
Court: Chennai
is appended as Annexure '6' to the petition. 2. M/s.Venkataramana Holdings Private Limited is the transferor company and M/s.Pricol Holdings Limited
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWharf (Holdings) Ltd. Vs. United Int'l Holdings, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Petitioner The Wharf (Holdings) Limited orally granted respondent United International Holdings, Inc., an option to buy 10% of the stock in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT
of Technip in April 2000 and submitted that ISIS was holding in Technip 11.80%, Gaz de France 10.90%, and Total Fina
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahindra Holdings and Finance Vs. Dcit and Ito
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
out the determinate shares of other members. Pattern of share holding is not necessarily the pattern of share of profits or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarcus Brown Holding Co., Inc. Vs. Feldman
Court: US Supreme Court
is a bill in equity brought by the Marcus Brown Holding Company, the appellant, owner of a large apartment house in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLok Holdings and Constructions Ltd. Vs. Housing Development and Improv ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR23
at 493,680 sq.ft. then the Assignee shall pay to Lok Holdings as stated above, further sum of Rs. 30,85,00,000/-. The Assignee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStock Holding Corporation of India Ltd. and Another Vs. Bharat Petrole ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1998]91CompCas862(Bom)
shown in the register of members of the respondents as holder of the said shares. Learned counsel further submitted that in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiddharth Holding Pvt. Ltd. a Company Registered Under the Companies A ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2004(2)ALLMR232; 2003(6)BomCR857
between the Society and its members but the right to hold flat accrued in favour of the Disputants because of being
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>