Skip to content


Hold - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: hold Page 1 of about 636 results (0.027 seconds)
May 15 1967 (FN)

Blankenship Vs. Holding

Court: US Supreme Court

- 387 U.S. 95 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court BLANKENSHIP v. HOLDING, 387 U.S. 95 (1967) 387 U.S. 95 BLANKENSHIP ET AL.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1967 (FN)

Holding Vs. Blankenship

Court: US Supreme Court

v. BLANKENSHIP - 387 U.S. 94 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court HOLDING v. BLANKENSHIP, 387 U.S. 94 (1967) 387 U.S. 94 HOLDING,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2016 (HC)

Venkataramana Holdings Private Limited Vs. Pricol Holdings Limited

Court: Chennai

M/s.Venkataramana Holdings Private Limited is the transferor company and M/s.Pricol Holdings Limited is the transferee company. 2.1. For the sake of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 2001 (FN)

Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. Vs. United Int'l Holdings, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

(2000). We conclude that it does. I Respondent United International Holdings, Inc., a Colorado-based company, sued petitioner The Wharf (Holdings) Limited,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2003 (TRI)

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT

already holding 18.17% voting capital in Coflexip, but Stena was holding 29.68%. ISIS, IFP, Technip combine wanted to control Coflexip and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2008 (TRI)

Mahindra Holdings and Finance Vs. Dcit and Ito

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

in the Revenue's contention that on account of reduction in holdings from 7.69% to 1.54% on 31^st March, 2000, a proportionate

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1921 (FN)

Marcus Brown Holding Co., Inc. Vs. Feldman

Court: US Supreme Court

is a bill in equity brought by the Marcus Brown Holding Company, the appellant, owner of a large apartment house in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 2009 (HC)

Lok Holdings and Constructions Ltd. Vs. Housing Development and Improv ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR23

Rs. 625/- per sq.ft. of such free TDR to Lok Holdings. Accordingly, if the TDR in respect of the above 2/3rd

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 1996 (HC)

Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd. and Another Vs. Bharat Petrole ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1998]91CompCas862(Bom)

annexure 'I' as transfer Nos. 1889 to 1892 from Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd. to Stock Holding Corporation of India

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2003 (HC)

Siddharth Holding Pvt. Ltd. a Company Registered Under the Companies A ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(2)ALLMR232; 2003(6)BomCR857

by the Registrar in favour of Disputant No. 2 to hold two flats. In so far as the Disputant No. 6

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //