Hoar - Judgment Search Results
Hoare Vs. Allen
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1789
HOARE v. ALLEN - 2 U.S. 102 (1789) U.S. Supreme Court HOARE v. ALLEN, 2 U.S. 102 (1789) 2
Hoare Miller and Co. Ltd. Vs. Bank of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
The Court: This is an application to set aside the ex parte decree dated 29th June, 2010. The advocate on record for the defendant is a very senior solicitor of this Court. The ground taken is...
Hoare Miller and Co. Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Collector of Customs and o ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-07-1975
Reported in: AIR1975Cal440
ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, J. 1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution Messrs. Hoare Miller & Co challenges the notice dated 5th October, 1967 issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Workmen of Hoare Miller and Co., Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-30-1961
Reported in: (1962)ILLJ721Cal
B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The question for consideration in this rule is whether retired workmen of respondent 3, Hoare Miller & Co., Ltd., are entitled to bonus for the year 1957 which was declared in the year
Assistant Collector of Customs for Exports, Calcutta and ors. Vs. Hoar ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Cal181,1986(10)ECC220,1987(11)LC193(Calcutta),1986(25)ELT516(Cal)
or to any place in Rhodesia.' No. IPC (Genl. 44)/65P. SabanayagamChief Controller of Imports & Exports'. 3. M/s. Hoare Miller & Co. Ltd., the respondent in this appeal carries on the business, inter alia, of export of
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hoare Miller and Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-22-1986
Reported in: [1987]166ITR341(Cal)
Sen, J.1. The material facts and proceedings leading up to the above references are, inter alia, that Messrs Hoare Miller & Co.Ltd., Calcutta, the assessee, is a company. The assessee is a leading exporter of jute products.
LachminaraIn Bhareodan Vs. Hoare, Miller and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-20-1913
Reported in: (1914)ILR41Cal35
does not explain how it was that after the 21st January, the date of the letter from Messrs. Hoare, Miller & Co., and before the 7th February, 1913, 375 bales came to be delivered. There is nothing
Messrs. Sadasook Ramprotap Vs. Hoare Miller and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-11-1923
Reported in: AIR1923Cal719,80Ind.Cas.632
Mookerjee, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Buckland in a suit for damages for breach of contract. On the 4th May 1921, and 9th June 1921, the defendants entered into two...
Buddree Doss and anr. Vs. Hoare, Miller and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-1881
Reported in: (1882)ILR8Cal170
whether jointly, severally, or in the alternative, in respect of the same matter.' Here the claim is against Hoare, Miller, & Co. If the facts turn out that Hoare, Miller, & Co. were the principals for whom
parties : a (Appellant) Vs. Hoare (Respondent), C (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-30-2008
people who commit sexual assaults are seldom worth suing. In the appeal before the House of A v Hoare [2006] 1 WLR 2320, the claimant decided to sue only when she heard that the defendant had won
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free