Hitting - Judgment Search Results

Avtar Singh Hit Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2006(9)SC111; 2006(10)SCALE271; (2006)8SCC487; 2006(2)LC1375(SC)

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 1.3.2006 passed by the Division Bench of Delhi High Court by which Letters Patent Appeals were allowed and the judgment...

Avtar Singh Hit Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 127(2006)DLT535

Vikramajit sen, J.1. Keeping in perspective the urgent nature of these writ petitions, Counter Affidavits being available on the record, and arguments having been heard in full detail, the matter was taken up for final disposal....

Bal Hit Shiksha Samiti Vs. Shri Dharam Singh and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2009(3)Raj2251

Raghuvendra S. Rathore, J.1. An application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has been filed by the workman, respondent No. 1 with the prayer that the same may be allowed and the petitioner...

Mayong Hit Sadhani Fishery Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. The State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

1. Heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned State Counsel. I have also heard Mr. M. Bhuyan, learned counsel representing the respondent No.4. 2. The challenge in the writ...

Hit Narayan Chaudhary Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Patna

P.K. Sarkar, J.1. This petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. is for quashing the order of cognizance dated 3.3.93 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (West) in G.R. Case No. 2/76.2. The brief facts leading to...

Ram Hit Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(3)AWC2415

A. K. Yog, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certtorari to quash the letter dated 26.5.2000 issued by Additional Commissioner, State Election...

Ram Hit Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary M.O.C. and I.T, Depa ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Shailendra Pandey, Member (A): 1. In this OA, the applicant, who was compulsorily retired as a Driver, Grade-I in the Mail Motor Service, New Delhi, has challenged the following orders: Order/notice dated 6.11.2009, for compulsorily retirement...

Tee-hit-ton Indians Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States - 348 U.S. 272 (1955) U.S. Supreme Court Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, 348 U.S. 272 (1955) Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States No. 43 Argued November 12, 1954 Decided February 7,...

Jithu Kuttichakku, vs Common Man Hits and Loans Private Ltd.,

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 15TH KARTHIKA, 1942 Ex.FA.No.38 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02-09-2019 IN E.A.NO.946/2012 IN E.A.1539/2010 IN...

Paramjit Singh Sarna, Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Committee and anr. Vs. Avtar ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 128(2006)DLT575

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, these Letters Patent Appeals are taken up for final hearing. 2. These LPAs arise from the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated...