Hinged - Judgment Search Results
Ajay Rajaram Hinge Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-20-2015
case was going on and on 17th October, 2014, Ashok reported to the police that the applicant Ajay Hinge along with co-accused and Swapnil went outside to celebrate birthday party of co-accused. When they were drinking liquor,
Jaurasia Hinges & Screws vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION
Deepak Hinges Private Ltd vs Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-14-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12059/2022 CM APPL. 38918/2023 DEEPAK HINGES PRIVATE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava & Mr. Mukul, Advs.versusPRINCIPAL CHIEF
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rama Hing Suppliers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2002
Reported in: [2003]259ITR306(Delhi)
S.K. Mahajan, J.1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the reassessment under Section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act on the ground...
Rama Hing Suppliers Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2002
Reported in: [2002]123TAXMAN800(Delhi)
ORDERBy way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the reassessment under section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act...
Nasik Hing Supplying Company Vs. Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-04-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Guj275; (2003)2GLR926; (2003)2PLR926; [2003]46SCL118(Guj)
Judge allowed the appeal and set aside the order dated 22-12-1995 granting the review application filed by Nasik Hing Supplying Co. (the appellant before us).Annapurna Udyog Bhandar (hereinafter referred to as 'Annapurna Udyog') had filed an application
Eknath Vishnoo Hinge and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-11-1984
Reported in: 1985(1)BomCR598; 1985MhLJ727
C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Respondent No. 18 the Pune Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd., is a specified society within the meaning of section 73-G of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act)....
Hing Raj Singh Vs. Raja Bhagwati Bux Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-14-1949
Reported in: AIR1952All427
Chandiramani, J. 1. This is the defendant's appeal against the appellate decree of Mr. B. N. Zutshi, Civil Judge, Rae Bareli, dated 25-5-1945. 2. The plaintiff alleged that he waa zamindar of the land in suit...
K.T. Hing Vs. I.N. Silas
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-31-1929
Reported in: AIR1930Cal713
Jack, J.1. The petitioner is one of the proprietors of the Chinese Theatre Studio on Chittaranjan Avenue. He has been convicted under Section 290, I.P.C., of committing a public nuisance by the annoyance caused by the...
Manohar Ramchandra Hinge Vs. the Collector of Nasik
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-1912
Reported in: (1912)14BOMLR943; 17Ind.Cas.670
Batchelor, J.1. The only question involved in this appeal is whether the Court below was right in its view that the suit was governed by the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act on the footing that the plaintiff...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free