Skip to content


Him - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: him Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 9,971 results (0.236 seconds)
Nov 08 2001 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Vs. Him Ispat Ltd.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-08-2001

Reported in: [2002]108CompCas537(HP)

..... its prima facie opinion that the sick industrial company m s him ispat ltd hil was not likely to make its net worth ..... industrial and financial reconstruction aaifr another appeal was also preferred by him ispat mazdoor singh against the aforesaid order of the bifr both ..... persisted that after the decision of the bifr this objection of him ispat ltd does not hold good therefore deserves to be rejected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 2001 (TRI)

Cce, Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Him Clylinders (P) Ltd., M/S.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-25-2001

1 this is an application filed by the commissioner central excise chandigarh for referring the following question of law to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Him-pushp Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-21-2001

1 the issue involved in this case is whether modvat credit to be claimed on waste generated during the production...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 2001 (TRI)

Shri Maninder Pal Singh, M/S. Him Vs. Cc New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-09-2001

..... advocate submits that there is another appeal filed by m s him electronics traders in which a prayer has been made for staying ..... same at this stage accordingly the stay application filed by m s him electronics traders is dismissed as not pressed 3 as regards the ..... was his submission that the appeal filed by the both m s him electronics traders and shri maninder pal singh be heard without insisting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Ajnala Coop. Sugar Mills Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-27-2001

Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC667

..... that the appellants therein had realised any amount over and above the price declared by him and accordingly the claim for differential duty was found to be unsustainable following the ratio .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Ct Scan Research Centre (P) Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2001

..... and fulfil all the conditions contained in the notification and failure on his part render him liable for payment of duty and the goods are liable for confiscation he therefore prays .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Topack Industries (India) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-27-2001

Reported in: (2001)(137)ELT1312Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the appeal the commissioner appeals has confirmed the order of the dy commissioner impugned before him imposing under rule 173q a penalty of rs 1 lakh on the appellant and confiscating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Balmer Lawrie Van Leer Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-27-2001

..... an authority of a power granted to it under the law in the case before him to recover duty i do not see how this observation have any bearing on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Air India Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-27-2001

Reported in: (2001)(77)ECC84

..... and set aside this order we remand the proceedings back to the jurisdictional commissioner for him to pass suitable orders in terms of sections 61 and 72 of the act which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2001 (TRI)

Dr. Pankaj Naram'S Herbal Vs. Commissioner Of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-27-2001

..... commissioner finds that it bore the brand name herbo which belonged to the applicant before him and therefore was not entitled to the benefit of the notification 1 93 5 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //