Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S. Him-pushp Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

M/S. Him-pushp Engineers vs Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 21, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/23966

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Him-pushp Engineers

Respondent

Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Excerpt

1. the issue involved in this case is whether modvat credit to be claimed on waste generated during the production. prima-facie, the assessee has got a case in view of the judgement of the larger bench of the tribunal in the case of wyeth laboratories ltd. vs. cc, bombay [2000 (120) e.l.t. 218]. hence, following the same, i waive the pre-deposit of the amounts due under the impugned order and stay its recovery during the pendency of the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The issue involved in this case is whether modvat credit to be claimed on waste generated during the production. Prima-facie, the assessee has got a case in view of the judgement of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Wyeth Laboratories Ltd. vs. CC, Bombay [2000 (120) E.L.T. 218]. Hence, following the same, I waive the pre-deposit of the amounts due under the impugned order and stay its recovery during the pendency of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial