Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Hereinafter Referred To - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1992

Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-01-1992

Reported in: AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)

gram site into freehold sites vide letter dated 19.11.1980. The Cantonment Board Pune - the respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Cantonment Board') on 2.12.1980 passed a resolution suggesting the set backs and recommended that the area … nil month April, 1981 resolved that the plans be sanctioned under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') subject to AHO's No Objection. It was clearly mentioned in the aforesaid resolution as under:The


Nov 09 1983

Jethsur Surangbhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-09-1983

Reported in: AIR1984SC151; 1984CriLJ162; 1983(2)Crimes942(SC); 1983(2)SCALE709; 1984Supp(1)SCC207; [1984]1SCR797

purpose of deciding the appeal. There was an organisation known as 'Jasdan Taluka Sahkari Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as theSangh') which was like an autonomous cooperative society directly within the control and supervision of the Government. … framed against him. The appellant will now be discharged from his bail-bonds and need not surrender. - - (hereinafter referred to as theSangh') which was like an autonomous cooperative society directly within the control and supervision of the Government.


Sep 26 1986

Panipat Woollen and General Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-1986

Reported in: 1986(2)SCALE536; (1986)4SCC368; [1986]3SCR937; 1987(1)LC288(SC)

Murari Mohan Dutt, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner, Panipat Woollen & General Mills Co. Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 'the Company', has challenged the taking over of the management of its two textile mills under the … and the rule nisi is discharged. There will, however, be no order as to costs. - - , hereinafter referred to as 'the Company',has challenged the taking over of the management of its two textile mills under the Sick


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 2007

Rose Valley Real Estate and Construction Ltd. Vs. United Commercial Ba ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Nov-20-2007

I.A. Ansari, J.1. M/s. Pramila Hotel (hereinafter referred 'to as 'the borrower') had enjoyed credit facilities with the UCO Bank (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent bank') … J.1. M/s. Pramila Hotel (hereinafter referred 'to as 'the borrower') had enjoyed credit facilities with the UCO Bank (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent bank') against mortgage of their total building, situated at West Agartala. As the borrower had


Mar 21 2005

Bihar State Co-operative Bank and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Mar-21-2005

the writ petitioners-respondents to show cause why the board of directors of the Patliputra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'Patliputra Bank') be not suspended. While quashing the aforesaid notice, his Lordship went to the question of … the order dated July 5, 2004 passed by the managing director of the Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'co-operative bank') an apex bank of the Patliputra Bank, whose chairman and director are the writ petitioners-respondents


Mar 14 2007

Shri Ram Niwas (Since Deceased) Through L.R. Vs. 1st Addl. District Ju ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-14-2007

Reported in: 2007(78)AWC2136

of Sub-section (2) of Section 20 of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972). The suit was contested by denying the plaint allegations and


Dec 24 2009

Mukesh Nayak Vs. Brijendra Pratap Singh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-24-2009

Reported in: 2010(1)MPHT396

In this petition, election of returned candidate, viz., the respondent to M.P. Legislative Assembly Constituency No. 58 Pawai (hereinafter referred to as 'the Constituency') has been called in question on the ground of irregularities in the counting of votes … the Election Commission as well as to the Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly. - - 58 Pawai (hereinafter referred to as 'the Constituency') has been called in question on the ground of irregularities in the counting of votes


May 23 1995

Gulmohar Finance Ltd. Vs. in Re and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-23-1995

Reported in: [1998]93CompCas544(Delhi)

Ltd., Sakar Impex Pvt. Ltd., Anupam Industrial Resources Ltd., Square Software Pvt. Ltd. and Ankur Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'transferor companies') with Gulmohar Finance Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'transferee company'). It has also … Pvt. Ltd. and Ankur Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'transferor companies') with Gulmohar Finance Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'transferee company'). It has also been claimed that the proposed scheme will result in economies of


Nov 01 2001

Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Nov-01-2001

Reported in: (2002)IILLJ70Guj

the workers as regular employees of the the respondent-company Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (Private) Ltd., respondent No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-company). The petitioner has also challenged the decision of the respondent-] company to retrench the services … relief is allowed. Interim relief granted by this Court on July 25, 2001 is vacated. - - 4 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-company). The petitioner has also challenged the decision of the respondent-] company to retrench the services


Oct 01 1992

Managing Director, Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Sel ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-01-1992

Reported in: 1994ACJ118

V. Ratnam, J.1. These appeals and revisions, at the instance of Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') as well as another appeal and memorandum of cross objections at the instance of the … no order as to costs either in the appeals, revisions or in the memoranda of cross-objections. - - (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') as well as another appeal and memorandum of cross objections at the instance of the


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial