Here - Year 1995 - Judgments

Jun 12 1995 (FN)

Missouri Vs. Jenkins

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-12-1995

..... relief id at 76 kennedy j concurring in part and concurring in judgment t here was no interdistrict constitutional violation that would support mandatory interdistrict relief 4 thus the ..... against interdistrict remedies for intradistrict violations applies to this case solely because the remedy here is meant to produce effects outside the district in which the violation occurred is flatly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 02 1995 (FN)

Field Vs. Mans

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-02-1995

..... the apparent negative pregnant under the rule of construction that an express statutory requirement here contrasted with statutory silence there shows an intent to confine the requirement to the ..... negligence is no bar to recovery because fraudulent misrepresentation is an intentional tort here a contrast between a justifiable and reasonable reliance is clear although the plaintiff s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 1995 (FN)

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-12-1995

..... a program is limited to eligibility for subcontracting provisions like the one at issue here in determining eligibility the sba presumes social disadvantage based on membership in certain minority ..... under the strictest judicial scrutiny justice powell s defense of this conclusion bears repeating here if it is the individual who is entitled to judicial protection against classifications based .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 1995 (FN)

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-11-1995

..... petitioner suggests that one consideration weighing in favor of finding the power to abrogate here is that the act authorizes only prospective injunctive relief rather than retroactive monetary relief ..... of this court that justice stevens cites and somehow labels incompatible with our decision here we specifically reserved the question whether the eleventh amendment would allow a suit to enforce .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 02 1995 (FN)

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-02-1995

..... authorities to exclude minority voters from their nomination processes confirms the conclusion that 5 applies here none of the reasons offered to support appellees contention that the white primary cases ..... and the creation or abolition of an elective office thus for example the party here states that besides nominating candidates other business at its conventions includes adoption of resolutions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1995 (FN)

Lebron Vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-21-1995

..... s decisions could be considered federal action held where as here the government creates a corporation by special law for the ..... of the inquiry the nonexistence of a regulatory taking whereas here it is quite impossible to consider whether the government ..... court substantively discussed only the second question that lebron argues here whether amtrak s conduct in this case implicates the presence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 1995 (FN)

Bmw of North America, Inc. Vs. Gore

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-11-1995

..... this is because the standards as the alabama supreme court authoritatively interpreted them here provided no significant constraints or protection against arbitrary results first the alabama statute ..... standards rather than arbitrariness or caprice fifth there are no other legislative enactments here that classify awards and impose quantitative limits that would significantly cabin the fairly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1995 (FN)

Vernonia School Dist. 47j Vs. Acton

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-1995

..... even though they are both blanket searches of a sort post at 682 the search here is undertaken for prophylactic and distinctly nonpunitive purposes protecting 659 respondents argue however that the ..... what the framers of the fourth amendment most strongly opposed with limited exceptions wholly inapplicable here were general searches that is searches by general warrant by writ of assistance by broad .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1995 (FN)

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. Vs. Pinette

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-1995

..... that that interest is not implicated in this case is strongly suggested by the presence here of the factors the court considered determinative in striking down state restrictions on religious ..... widmar and lamb s chapel is the difference between government speech and private speech t here is a crucial difference between government speech endorsing religion which the establishment clause forbids and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1995 (FN)

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-26-1995

..... even though no such substantial effect was visible to the naked eye they are lacking here 4 the government argues that congress has accumulated institutional expertise regarding the regulation of ..... the fifth circuit that importation of previous findings to justify 922 q is especially inappropriate here because the prior federal enactments or congressional findings do not speak to the subject .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Here - Judgment Search Results