Here - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: here Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 314 results (0.116 seconds)Texas and Pacific Railway Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1933
..... moreover though not considered as localities served be involved in acts of discrimination the situation here presented furnishes a close analogy to proportional rates or combination rates and with respect ..... effect upon the localities concerned from the rate structure resulting in the discrimination disclosed here footnote 2 2 the existence of those equalizations before 1887 and the fact that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManabendra Nath Roy Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-02-1933
Reported in: AIR1933All498
..... your presence will be greatly appreciated the delegates should reach here not later than the end of january 18 each of these ..... a preliminary conference of the pioneers for all the provinces here with the committee representatives 2 calling of national convention on the ..... of the necessity of sending delegates to the preliminary conference here then to take care of the technical part of the work .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFactor Vs. Laubenheimerl
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-04-1933
..... principles consistently recognized and applied by this court are now to be discarded their application here leads inescapably to the conclusion that the treaties presently involved on their face require the ..... both countries in that respect it is identical with item 3 which covers the receiving here involved in that country false testimony whether material or not constitutes perjury but materiality is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLos Angeles Gas and Elec. Corp. Vs. Railroad Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-08-1933
..... is no rational foundation for the amount attributed to it here 5 as the commission s refusal to apply principles of valuation established ..... in opposition to constitutional law as established by numerous decisions here said it is safe to say that in practically none if any ..... the commission s order of november 24 1930 establishing the rates here in question provided for the acceptance at the company s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnglo-chilean Nitrate Sales Corp Vs. Alabama
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-06-1933
..... which constituted its business was immune from state taxation the statute here under review has no reference to imports but is merely of ..... under 54 the alabama statute is unlike that of michigan examined here in detroit international bridge co v michigan 287 u s ..... very similar in form to the statute of alabama in controversy here the conduct of the aggrieved corporation was however very different its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRogers Vs. Guaranty Trust Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-23-1933
..... shares of common stock and other directors who are respondents here received substantial amounts in that of 1929 one year before ..... stewardship and to justify their action the defendants the respondents here place their whole reliance upon a statute of new jersey ..... subsequently mentioned to the stockholders until after the stock allotments here involved the only hint of the intention of the management .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRasoolbibi Vs. Yusuf Ajam Piperdi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-14-1933
Reported in: AIR1933Bom324; (1933)35BOMLR643
..... have been relied on before the learned commissioner in the exceptions filed here the commissioner s finding is challenged on the sole ground that ..... there is no such repugnancy in the present devise the question here is whether life estates are to be regarded as absolute estates ..... goes to the heirs of hafizabibi what is given to ajam here can be called a personal remainder it is neither a vested .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohnson Vs. Manhattan Railway Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1933
..... and presents questions fraught with difficulty and exceptional delicacy this was true of the receivership here in question it involved properties estimated to approximate 500 000 000 in value which ..... participation in the receivership proceedings the embarrassment would be relieved and the belief is ventured here that on further reflection he will recognize the propriety of so doing and by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLouis K. Liggett Co. Vs. Lee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-13-1933
..... the result that those who would have otherwise incorporated here or remained here are going to other states there is no gain ..... classification id 4 there is nothing in the florida statute here in question indicating that the discrimination based on counties was ..... stores owned by individuals may be subjected to the discrimination here challenged need not however be decided this case requires decision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Dubilier Condenser Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-10-1933
..... a different end to the establishment of what is conceded here that dunmore and lowell were not specifically hired or directed ..... agricultural resources of the country the principle is the same here though the inventions are of importance only in the furtherance ..... employment did not contemplate invention at all the issue raised here is unaffected by legislation undoubtedly the power rests with congress .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial