Here - Judgment Search Results
Unite Here Local 355 Vs. Mulhall
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall - 12-99 (2013) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of...
National Mineral Development Corporation Limited a Company Incorporate ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-27-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)KLJ235; 2007(1)KCCRSN16; 2007(1)AIRKarR402
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are challenging the notifications dated 17.2.2003 and 15.3.2003 issued by the Government of Karnataka, complaining that their preferential rights under Rule 11(2) of the Mines and...
i) What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Occurrence in Thi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
CRA No.971-SB o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.971-SB of 2000 Date of Decision:-19.11.2012 Amar Singh & Ors. .....Appellants Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
i) What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Occurrence in Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
CRR No.46 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.46 of 2007 Date of Decision:-9.11.2012 Gurcharan Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER...
“10. We Would Like to Point out Here That the Appellants HereIn Had ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
CWP No.9038 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9038 of 2010 Date of Decision:26.09.2013 Suresh Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE...
Acquisition Act 1894 (here-in-after referred to as 'The Act'), Vs. Sub ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3178 of 2014 Date of Decision: February 20, 2014 Subhash Chand and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :...
“10. What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Indicated Nar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
CRM No.M-705 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No.M-705 of 2014 Date of Decision:-18.7.2014 Kamaljit Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR...
“it Is Pertinent to Mention Here That the Order Vide Which the Vs. B ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
Rs.No.3627 of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.3627 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.08.2014 Parminder Singh Rahi ..Appellant versus BSNL and others ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR...
Basanta Kumari Chaudhubani and anr. Executrices of the Wlll of Late Sa ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-09-1920
Reported in: 59Ind.Cas.312
1. This appeal arises out of a suit for arrears of rent. The plaintiffs sue as patnidars of a debutter mahal dedicated to a deity spoken of as Kali Doyamoyi. It appears that the predecessors of...
Renuka Lakshmi Granites, a Partnership Firm Regstd. Under the Indian P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-05-2008
Reported in: ILR2008KAR2776; 2008(2)KCCR1234; 2008(3)AIRKarR390; 2008AIHC2586(Kar)
K. Ramanna, J.1. This appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff challenging the Order dated 4.7.2003 passed in O.S. No. 7762/2000 by the XXVII Addl. city Civil Judge, Bangalore whereby the said Court had held that it...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free