Hence - Year 1912 - Judgments

Aug 16 1912 (PC)

In Re: Somayajulu Ramamurthi-counter

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-16-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.251

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1912 (PC)

Moolinti Veerana Gowd Vs. Devarinti Bhima Reddy

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-07-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.253

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 1912 (PC)

Komandur Kamalammal Vs. Komandur Narasimhacharlu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-13-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.244

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 1912 (PC)

Parvataneni Venkatramiah and ors. Vs. Parvataneni Narayudu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-23-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.246

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 1912 (PC)

Arunagiri Mudaliar Vs. Uthando Mudali

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-20-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.242

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1912 (PC)

The Anglo-Indian Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Gerald Frank Brierly

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-04-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.256

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 1912 (PC)

Emperor Vs. C.W. King

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-13-1912

Reported in: (1912)14BOMLR236

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions 2 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1912 (PC)

Rangubai Vs. Subaji Ramchandra Kulkarni

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-30-1912

Reported in: (1912)14BOMLR267

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1912 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Nandbasappa Basappa

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-20-1912

Reported in: (1912)14BOMLR360

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 14 1912 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Chhotalal Babar (No. 2.)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-14-1912

Reported in: (1912)14BOMLR367

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions but .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Hence - Judgment Search Results