Skip to content


Hence - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: hence Year: 1928 Page 1 of about 206 results (0.132 seconds)
Dec 11 1928 (PC)

K. Shanmugasundara Mudaliar and ors. Vs. S. Ratnavelu Mudaliar and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad429; 121Ind.Cas.16

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1928 (PC)

Ayyaswami Iyer Vs. Mahadeva Iyer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-20-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.57

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Gopala Murgis

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-24-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom138; (1928)30BOMLR389

..... section 390 of the criminal procedure code are very wide and give a discretion to the court hence a direction that the sentence of whipping should be executed as soon as practicable is ..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1928 (PC)

Somu Iyer Vs. Chelliah Pillai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.43

..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section ..... person discharged does not even have protection under section 300 of cr p c and hence such a person cannot assail the explanation 1 to the impugned rule 14 b section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1928 (PC)

Hari Govind Phadke Vs. Gangubai Balwant Patil

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-16-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom417; (1928)30BOMLR500

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions 262 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1928 (PC)

Supdu Daulatsing Daji Patil Vs. Sakharam Ramji

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-16-1928

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR537

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 1928 (PC)

H. Vs. H.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-01-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom279; (1928)30BOMLR523; 110Ind.Cas.266

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1928 (PC)

BadruddIn Abdul Rahim Vs. Sitaram Vinayak Apte

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-02-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom371; (1928)30BOMLR942; 114Ind.Cas.241

..... the day it was published in the bombay government gazette i e february 2 1928 hence where a second appeal was disposed of on january 19 1928 and an appeal under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 1928 (PC)

Tilakram Chaudhuri Vs. Kodumal Jethanand Wadhwa

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-03-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom175; (1928)30BOMLR546; 110Ind.Cas.727

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions 4 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 1928 (PC)

Annabhat Shankarbhat Alvandi Vs. Shivappa Dundappa Manvi

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-19-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom232; (1928)30BOMLR539; 110Ind.Cas.269

..... constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection can be granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //