Hear - Judgment Search Results
Sri Sai Hearing Solution Vs Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.Nos.21189 & 21190 of 2026 Sri Sai Hearing Solution Represented by its Proprietor Kevin Russel John, No. 3205, B - Type, 3rd Main Road,MMDA , Mathur
After Hearing Learned Counsel for Vs. Weeks. the
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2012
No. 11714/2011 (stay) Issue notice. Mr. Mohan M. Lal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the Court is of the opinion that the interim order sought, can be
“after Hearing Respective Contentions of Both Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
order dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure P-6).The Court of Revision while dismissing the revision petition has observed as under:- “After hearing respective contentions of both the sides and also having gone through the record carefully it is found that
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“4. After Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner I Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
judgment reported as Chand Singh versus Naranjan Singh and another, 1990 (1) Simla Law Journal 292. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. It appears that
“after Hearing Learned Counsel for Both the Parties and Going Vs. Ma ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
which was also dismissed vide order dated 17.4.2012. The relevant portion of the order reads thus :- “After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and going through the record of the case file, it has come
“8. After Hearing Arguments from Both the Sides and Perusing Vs. Fin ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
passed by the Collector is perverse, arbitrary or contrary to law, has been rightly set aside. We have heard counsel for the parties, perused the paper book and the impugned ordeRs.The principle that appellate and revisional authorities
“after Hearing Both the Counsel for the Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
factum of the filing of the previous suit was not denied by the defendant. The trial Court after hearing counsel for the parties found no merit in the application filed by the petitioner for leading additional evidence
“after Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Parties and Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
the Punjab State Education Department was not issued any notice and has not been granted any opportunity of hearing prior to taking a decision as regards denial of pay and allowances for the period he had remained
“after Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Vs. State of P ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
1992 -3- 4. While issuing notice of motion, the Division Bench passed the following order on 29.07.1992: “After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the detailed orders passed by the original as
“after Hearing the Counsel for the Parties This Court Is of Consider ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
present petition, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free