Headed - Judgment Search Results

Head Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

HEAD v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 509 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court HEAD v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 509 (1963) 374

Head Vs. New Mexico Board of Exam'rs

Court: US Supreme Court

Head v. New Mexico Board of Exam'rs - 374 U.S. 424 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Head v. New Mexico

Head Vs. Hargrave

Court: US Supreme Court

Head v. Hargrave - 105 U.S. 45 (1881) U.S. Supreme Court Head v. Hargrave, 105 U.S. 45 (1881) Head

Head Vs. Amoskeag Mfg. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Head v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co. - 113 U.S. 9 (1885) U.S. Supreme Court Head v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 113

Head Vs. the University

Court: US Supreme Court

Head v. The University - 86 U.S. 526 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court Head v. The University, 86 U.S. 19

New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Head

Court: US Supreme Court

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head - 234 U.S. 166 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head, 234 U.S. 166

New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Head

Court: US Supreme Court

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head - 234 U.S. 149 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head, 234 U.S. 149

The Chief of Army Staff, Army Head Quarters Vs. the Chief of Army Staf ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

to the rank of Subedar Major. He was also called for interview at Air Defence Artillery (Co-ordination), Army Head Quarters along with four Junior Commissioned Officers (clerks). According to the petitioner, the Interview Board told him that

Head Master, Lawrence School, Vs. Jayanthi Raghu and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

three years and the rule does not provide any further extension of probation. If that be so, the Headmaster of the school would be entitled to pass orders as to the confirmation before the expiry of the

Commander Head Quarter, Calcutta and Others Vs. Capt. Biplabendra Chan ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)678; AIR1997SC2607; JT1997(10)SC371; 1996(8)SCALE66; (1997)1SCC208; [1996]Supp8SCR472; 1997(1)SLJ143(SC)

1. Heard the Counsel for both the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissing the writ appeal preferred by the appellants. The respondent...