Have Interest - Judgment Search Results

Citizens Interest Agency Vs. Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre Pv ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2003(3)KLT424

2002 have come to this Court for protecting their personal interest. They complain that the plans contained in Map 33 A

interest but the Respondents Have Failed to Discharge Vs. Sub Division ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

for purchase of a Tractor. The loan was payable with interest @ 15% per annum with half yearly rests. In order

General Interest Insurance Company Vs. Ruggles

Court: US Supreme Court

v. Ruggles, 25 U.S. 12 Wheat. 408 408 (1827) General Interest Insurance Company v. Ruggles 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 408 ERROR

Public Interest Foundation Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

by the 34 Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 16.12.2013 in Public Interest Foundation and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Anr., vide

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

enabling power for the purpose of protecting the rights and interest of different sections of the population of Sikkim.83. Article 371F

State Public Interest Protection Council Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR2007Ori159; 2007(I)OLR719

filed the instant writ petition in the form of Public Interest Litigation inter alia alleging that the Government of India in

Amount and Interest Accrued thereon Along with Penalty Etc. If Vs. Smt ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

amount was to be paid in 168 monthly installments with interest @ 10% P.A.from the date of offer of possession. The

Consumer Interests Protection and Research Association (Cipra) Vs. Apo ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Member: The complaint is filed through the Consumer Council, Consumer Interest Protection and Research Association (CIPRA) Hyderabad seeking direction against the

Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals)

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(P& H)174; [2005]274ITR69(P& H)

the same is not covered within the definition of chargeable interest under the Interest-tax Act.'5. In part III of the return,

Sri. Rajkiran Sadanand Raikar Vs. Owners & Parties Interested in the V ...

Court: Karnataka

order:05.07.2016 in CP.No.178/2016 Rajkiran Sadanand Raikar Vs Owners & Parties interested in the Vessel M.V. Maharshi Mahatreya and others 3. Learned