Hatting - Judgment Search Results

Bara Bazar Hat Vyavasayik Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by Letter No. 295 dated 26.9.2007 contained in Annexure-5 whereby they have been directed to make an agreement for payment of higher rate.2. The case of the petitioners...

East India Hat Co. Vs. Prakash Road Lines (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(1986)ACC108; 1986(2)ARBLR39(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT94; 1986(10)DRJ133

G.C. Jain, J. (1) M/S. East India Hat Co., the petitioner, entrusted one wooden case containing caps at Delhi to M/s. Parkash Road lines (P) Ltd., the respondent at Delhi for carriage to Panjim under goods...

Mahaveer Hat Manufacturing Company and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 5(1969)DLT566

S. Rangarajan , J. (1) The petitioners seek to quash the order passed by the Director General of Supplies & Disposals (Second respondent) on 19th Augast. 1987 black listing the firm which has been described as...

Mahaveer Hat Manufacturing Co. Vs. Deputy D.O.R. (Water)

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act), is directed against order dated 10.11.2000, passed by District Forum-I,...

National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. Vs. Hedden

Court: US Supreme Court

National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. Hedden - 148 U.S. 482 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. Hedden, 148 U.S. 482 (1893) National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. Hedden No. 138 Argued...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Hat Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC791; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)378; 2003CriLJ884; JT2003(1)SC77; 2003(1)SCALE43; (2003)2SCC152; [2003]1SCR38; 2003(1)LC407(SC); 2003(1)WLN722

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. The Rajasthan Sati (Prevention) Ordinance 1987 was promulgated by the Governor of Rajasthan on 01.10.1987. The following Sections of the Ordinance are relevant for our purpose and hence are extracted and reproduced hereunder:-2(b)....

Management of Koiri Hitkarini Panchit Hat Samittee Vs. State of Bihar ...

Court: Patna

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J. and Shashank Kumar Singh, J.1. The appellant challenged the award of Labour Court, Patna in Reference Case No. 18 of 1988. The award is dated June 6, 1994. The dispute is in...

United States Vs. Twenty-five Packages of Panama Hats

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama Hats - 231 U.S. 358 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama Hats, 231 U.S. 358 (1913) United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama Hats...

United States Vs. Nine Cases of Silk Hats

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Nine Cases of Silk Hats - 58 U.S. 97 (1854) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Nine Cases of Silk Hats, 58 U.S. 17 How. 97 97 (1854) United States v. Nine Cases...

Kewal Chand Mimani (D) by Lrs. Vs. S.K. Sen and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2569; JT2001(6)SC264; (2002)1MLJ17(SC); 2001(4)SCALE559; (2001)6SCC512; [2001]3SCR1056

Banerjee, J.1. While there is no divergence of opinion as regards status of a former tenant and his possession is juridical and protected by statute, the issue in the contextual facts, however pertains to State Government's...