Hat - Judgment Search Results
Bara Bazar Hat Vyavasayik Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-25-2009
authority would charge only ground rent and not for the structure. It is further pointed out that the Hats and Bazar which were earlier settled by the Revenue Department, has now been transferred to the Marketing Board.3.
East India Hat Co. Vs. Prakash Road Lines (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-1985
Reported in: I(1986)ACC108; 1986(2)ARBLR39(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT94; 1986(10)DRJ133
G.C. Jain, J. (1) M/S. East India Hat Co., the petitioner, entrusted one wooden case containing caps at Delhi to M/s. Parkash Road lines (P) Ltd.,
Mahaveer Hat Manufacturing Company and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1969
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT566
S. Rangarajan , J. (1) The petitioners seek to quash the order passed by the Director General of Supplies & Disposals (Second respondent) on 19th Augast. 1987 black listing the firm which has been described as...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahaveer Hat Manufacturing Co. Vs. Deputy D.O.R. (Water)
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2000
Act), is directed against order dated 10.11.2000, passed by District Forum-I, in Complaint Case No. 186/2000-entitled M/s. Mahaveer Hat Manufacturer Company v. Deputy D.O.R. (Water). 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly
National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. Vs. Hedden
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-03-1893
National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. Hedden - 148 U.S. 482 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court National Hat Pouncing Machine Co.
State of Rajasthan Vs. Hat Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC791; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)378; 2003CriLJ884; JT2003(1)SC77; 2003(1)SCALE43; (2003)2SCC152; [2003]1SCR38; 2003(1)LC407(SC); 2003(1)WLN722
R.C. Lahoti, J.1. The Rajasthan Sati (Prevention) Ordinance 1987 was promulgated by the Governor of Rajasthan on 01.10.1987. The following Sections of the Ordinance are relevant for our purpose and hence are extracted and reproduced hereunder:-2(b)....
Management of Koiri Hitkarini Panchit Hat Samittee Vs. State of Bihar ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-25-2003
The award is dated June 6, 1994. The dispute is in between the Management of Koiri Hitkarini Panchit Hat Samittee and the Workmen.2. The reference was made under Section 10(1)(c) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the reference
United States Vs. Twenty-five Packages of Panama Hats
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-01-1913
United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama Hats - 231 U.S. 358 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama Hats, 231 U.S.
United States Vs. Nine Cases of Silk Hats
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1854
United States v. Nine Cases of Silk Hats - 58 U.S. 97 (1854) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Nine Cases of Silk Hats, 58 U.S.
Kewal Chand Mimani (D) by Lrs. Vs. S.K. Sen and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC2569; JT2001(6)SC264; (2002)1MLJ17(SC); 2001(4)SCALE559; (2001)6SCC512; [2001]3SCR1056
The land admittedly was used for a local weekly market (or 'Hat' in popular parlance) known as 'Mangla Hat'. Interestingly the local market used to assemble on every Tuesday and it is therefrom only the local market
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free