Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Harris V First - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 2022

Harris V. vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-14-2022

2022 / 25TH MAGHA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 810 OF 2022 Crime No.16/2022 of Edathala Police Station PETITIONERS:1 HARRIS V. AGED 56 YEARS VAZHIPOKKIL HOUSE KUNNAMANGALAM POST 2 FATHIMA NAMSHEENA AGED 33 YEARS FAROOQ HOUSE PADANILAM POST KUNNAMANGALAM … OF BAIL APPL. 810/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Memorandum of Bail MEMORANDUM OF BAIL APPLICATION Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 08.01.2022 IN CRIME NO.16/2022 REGISTERED AT EDATHALA POLICE STATION Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT(CMP NO.1800/2021) DATED


May 20 2020

Harry V Manjooran vs the Kunnamkulam Municipality

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-20-2020

KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2020 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1942 PETITIONERS: 1 HARRY V MANJOORAN S/O VARGHESE MANJOORAN, AGED 41 YEARS, MANJOORAN HOUSE, KUNNAMKULAM, 2 STEBY PANACKAL


Aug 29 2005

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Miss. Vijaya R. Baait and Shri ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-29-2005

Reported in: I(2006)ACC231; 2007ACJ463; 2005(4)ALLMR794; [2006(108)FLR357]; (2006)ILLJ968Bom; 2005(4)MhLj1018

appellants was directed to pay Rs. 70,000/- inclusive of Rs. 12,000/- payable under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act to the Respondent No. 1 who was claimant before the Tribunal. 3. Undisputed facts in this case … the leave salary from E.S.I.C. or from her company. 8. Counsel for the appellants therefore strenuously urged that, firstly, if the respondent No. 1 has received compensation under E.S.I.C. Act, then by virtue of Section 53 she


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial