Harmel - Judgment Search Results
Burnet Vs. Harmel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-07-1932
Burnet v. Harmel - 287 U.S. 103 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103 (1932) Burnet v. Harmel
Harmel Chand Vs. Amritsar Const. Co. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2004
Reported in: I(2005)ACC188
by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal is as follows:-'The present claim petition has been filed by the petitioner, Harmel Chand u/s 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for grant of compensation against the Amritsar Construction Company,
Harmel Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-29-1993
Reported in: (1993)112CTR(P& H)1; [1993]204ITR334(P& H)
Director of Income-tax received a complaint that the firm, Messrs. Gill and Company, is mainly handled by Mr. Harmel Singh Gill Khanna. It is stated in that complaint that Mr. Harmel Singh Gill prepares duplicate furnace oil.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Harmel Singh Vs. the State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-1971
Reported in: 1972CriLJ1648
Man Mohan Singh Gujral, J.1. Harmel Singh. a teacher under suspension and Harbans Lal have been convicted under Sections 363 and 366 of the
Ranjit Singh @ Motta Vs. Harmel Kaur
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-31-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ449
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter called SC/ST Act). 2. Respondent Harmel Kaur had filed a criminal complaint under Section 3(X) of the SC/ST Act, against the present petitioners Ranjit
Jangir Singh and anr. Vs. Harmel Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-1970
Reported in: (1970)72PLR1018
642.2. Hazur Singh sold the land in dispute to Jangir Singh and others. This sale was pre-empted by Harmel Singh. He claimed possession by pre-emption on the ground that he was the son of the vendor. When
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free