Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Harmel - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 07 1932

Burnet Vs. Harmel

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-07-1932

Burnet v. Harmel - 287 U.S. 103 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103 (1932) Burnet v. Harmel


Oct 14 2004

Harmel Chand Vs. Amritsar Const. Co. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-14-2004

Reported in: I(2005)ACC188

by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal is as follows:-'The present claim petition has been filed by the petitioner, Harmel Chand u/s 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for grant of compensation against the Amritsar Construction Company,


Jan 29 1993

Harmel Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-29-1993

Reported in: (1993)112CTR(P& H)1; [1993]204ITR334(P& H)

Director of Income-tax received a complaint that the firm, Messrs. Gill and Company, is mainly handled by Mr. Harmel Singh Gill Khanna. It is stated in that complaint that Mr. Harmel Singh Gill prepares duplicate furnace oil.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 05 1971

Harmel Singh Vs. the State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-05-1971

Reported in: 1972CriLJ1648

Man Mohan Singh Gujral, J.1. Harmel Singh. a teacher under suspension and Harbans Lal have been convicted under Sections 363 and 366 of the


Aug 31 2001

Ranjit Singh @ Motta Vs. Harmel Kaur

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-31-2001

Reported in: 2002CriLJ449

the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter called SC/ST Act). 2. Respondent Harmel Kaur had filed a criminal complaint under Section 3(X) of the SC/ST Act, against the present petitioners Ranjit


May 06 1970

Jangir Singh and anr. Vs. Harmel Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-06-1970

Reported in: (1970)72PLR1018

642.2. Hazur Singh sold the land in dispute to Jangir Singh and others. This sale was pre-empted by Harmel Singh. He claimed possession by pre-emption on the ground that he was the son of the vendor. When


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial