Hare - Judgment Search Results
Naseera vs Harees
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-17-2023
33 YEARS PALATTUTHARAYIL VEEDU, EASWARA MANGALAM AMSOM, PUZHAMBRAM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: HAREES, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.THOZHUTHINGAL KUNHITTY, KOLALAMBU AMSOM,POOKARATHARA DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 677 610 BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
Harees vs Revenue Divisional Officer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 23RD MAGHA, 1940 PETITIONER/S: HAREES, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O SUBAIRKUNJU, MANGALATHU VEETTIL, CLAPPANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/S: 1
Haring Vs. Prosise
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-13-1983
Haring v. Prosise - 462 U.S. 306 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306 (1983) Haring v. Prosise No. 81-2169 Argued April 20, 1983 Decided June 13, 1983 462 U.S. 306 CERTIORARI TO...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Scholle Vs. Hare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-23-1962
Scholle v. Hare - 369 U.S. 429 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Scholle v. Hare, 369 U.S. 429 (1962) Scholle v. Hare
Marshall Vs. Hare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1964
MARSHALL v. HARE - 378 U.S. 561 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court MARSHALL v. HARE, 378 U.S. 561 (1964) 378 U.S. 561
Badgley Vs. Hare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-21-1966
BADGLEY v. HARE - 385 U.S. 114 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court BADGLEY v. HARE, 385 U.S. 114 (1966) 385 U.S. 114
Mackenzie Vs. Hare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1915
Mackenzie v. Hare - 239 U.S. 299 (1915) U.S. Supreme Court Mackenzie v. Hare, 239 U.S. 299 (1915) Mackenzie v. Hare
Hare Vs. Rice
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-28-1907
Hare v. Rice - 204 U.S. 291 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Hare v. Rice, 204 U.S. 291 (1907) Hare
Abdul Gafoor vs Harees
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-17-2023
33 YEARS PALATTUTHARAYIL VEEDU, EASWARA MANGALAM AMSOM, PUZHAMBRAM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: HAREES, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.THOZHUTHINGAL KUNHITTY, KOLALAMBU AMSOM,POOKARATHARA DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 677 610 BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
Prohibition Party of Michigan Vs. Hare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-24-1967
PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE - 386 U.S. 713 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Reports PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free