Harbour - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: harbour Page 1 of about 50 results (0.011 seconds)Harbor Tug and Barge Co. Vs. Papai
Court: US Supreme Court
S. 81 (1991), the District Court granted a motion by Harbor Tug "to confirm" the earlier summary adjudication of Papai's nonseaman
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPortsmouth Harbor Land and Hotel Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
use by a small detail from Fort Constitution, across the harbor, and that it was the policy and practice of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCharlotte Harbor and Northern Ry. Co. Vs. Wells
Court: US Supreme Court
Wells - 260 U.S. 8 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Charlotte Harbor & Northern Ry. Co. v. Wells, 260 U.S. 8 (1922)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrays Harbor Logging Co. Vs. Coats-fordney Logging Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
of the State of Washington for Chehalis County against Grays Harbor Logging Company and W. E. Boeing wherein it sought to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarine Harbor Properties, Inc. Vs. Manufacturers Trust Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Marine Harbor Properties, Inc. v. Manufacturers Trust Co. - 317 U.S. 78
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPortsmouth Harbor Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
States - 250 U.S. 1 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Portsmouth Harbor Co. v. United States, 250 U.S. 1 (1919) Portsmouth Harbor
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Harbour Launch Service Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1983)LC388DTri(Mum.)bai
30,000/- from the guarantor. In the aforesaid circumstances, M/s. National Harbour Launch Service have filed the present application for stay of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Harbour Launch Services Vs. A.M. Prasad, Additional Collector ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 1992(41)LC647(Bombay)
at about 9.30 p.m. the launch was interrupted in Bombay harbour by Customs Petrol party on suspicion. The search of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Harbour View Residency Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Kerala
193 WP(C).No. 3206 of 2013 (A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M/S. HARBOUR VIEW RESIDENCY PVT. LTD., M.G. ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Harbour View Residency Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Kerala
193 WP(C).No. 2445 of 2013 (E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M/S. HARBOUR VIEW RESIDENCY PVT. LTD., M.G.ROAD,ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,BABU
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>