Habeas Corpus - Judgment Search Results
Manphool Singh Vs. State (Habeas Corpus) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
-1- DB Habeas Corpus Petition No.12067/2012 Manphool Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::23. d November, 2012 HON'BLE … Mr. Pradeep Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. K.R.Bishnoi, Government Advocate. Mr. Vineet Jain, for the respondents. .... This Habeas Corpus petition is preferred by Shri Manphool Singh son of Bhagirath, aged 25 years, resident of 29 STG, Tehsil
Uda Ram Vs. State (Habeas Corpus) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
D.B. HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO. 6877/2012. Uda Ram Vs. The State (Habeas Corpus) & Ors. 1 D.B. HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO. … D.B. HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO. 6877/2012. Uda Ram Vs. The State (Habeas Corpus) & Ors. 1 D.B. HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO. 6877/2012. Uda Ram Vs. The State (Habeas Corpus) & Ors.
Madhu Vs. State (Habeas Corpus)
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-18-2012
5 D.B. HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION NO. 4668/2012. Madhu Vs. State (Habeas Corpus) .. Date of Order ::18. h May 2012. HON'BLE … 5 D.B. HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION NO. 4668/2012. Madhu Vs. State (Habeas Corpus) .. Date of Order ::18. h May 2012. HON'BLE MR JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Gulab Bai Vs. State (Habeas Corpus) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
[1]. D.B. CIVIL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) PETITION NO.12898/2012 Date of Order ::04. 04.2014 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN … Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocate General, and Mr. Shiv Kumar Vyas, Government Advocate, for the respondents The five habeas corpus petitions [D.B. Civil Writ (Habeas Corpus) Petition Nos.12898/2012, 1091/2013, 6977/2013, 13818/2013 and 14359/2013]. are before us and in
O (FC) (Appellant) Vs. Crown Court at Harrow (Respondents) (Criminal A ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jul-26-2006
of compatibility with the Convention. On 20 March 2003 the appellant applied in addition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his continued custody since the expiry of the custody time limit on 7 June … following a two-day hearing, the Divisional Court dismissed the claim for judicial review and refused the application for habeas corpus. They certified, however, three points of law of general public importance in respect of which the House later
In Re Hilali (Respondent) (Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus)
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-30-2008
grant on 25 April 2007 by the Divisional Court (Smith LJ and Irwin J) of a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum to the respondent, Farid Hilali, on the ground that his detention in custody while he was … event support the inference that they were conspiring to commit the terrorist attacks in the United States. The habeas corpus application 9. On 17 November 2006 the respondent began the proceedings that led to his being granted a
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free