H - Judgment Search Results

H. Vs. H.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1937)39BOMLR1182

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is a husband's petition for divorce, and Mr. O'Gorman has drawn my attention to a question as to jurisdiction arising from

H. Vs. H.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1928Bom279; (1928)30BOMLR523; 110Ind.Cas.266

Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. This case is another illustration of the difficulties confronted by those who have to administer jurisdiction under the Divorce Act in this country as compared with the Divorce Courts in England.

H vs State of Nct Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1927/2026, CRL.M.A. 7934/2026 H .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Shyam, Advocate alongwith

H Vs. W and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(97)DRJ609

is directed against the judgment dated 20.12.2004 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi dismissing the appellant's petition HMA No. 303 of 2003 for dissolution of his marriage with Respondent No. 1 under Section 13(1)(ia) of the

A. Vs. H.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom70; (1992)94BOMLR154

the appellant wife from the judgment and order of the Family Court, Pune, granting divorce to the respondent husband. This appeal raises an important question, viz., whether a petitioner in support of his case can rely on

H.P.St.Electricity Regulatory Comm. Andanr Vs. H.P.State Electricity B ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6128 OF2009Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Regulatory Commission and another ...Appellants Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6129 of 2009 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6130 of 2009 WITH

H.M.T. Ltd. Vs. H.M.T. Head Office Employees' Assocn. and others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)108; AIR1997SC585; [1997(75)FLR29]; JT1996(10)SC64; 1996(7)SCALE898; (1996)11SCC319; [1996]Supp8SCR69

in minimum wage with the minimum wage payable to the employees of another public sector undertaking namely; Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'BHEL') is challenged by the managements as well as the workmen in

M.O.H. Uduman and Others Vs. M.O.H. Aslum

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1020; (1991)1MLJ46(SC); (1991)1SCC412; [1990]Supp2SCR663; 1991(1)LC203(SC)

leave is granted.2. The appeal arises against the judgment and decree of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated November 17, 1988 made in L.P.A. No. 113 of 1986 reversing the judgment and decree of

Harendra H. Mehta and ors. Vs. Mukesh H. Mehta and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC2054; 1999(3)ALLMR(SC)348; [1999]97CompCas265(SC); [1999]238ITR158(SC); JT1999(4)SC50; 1999(3)SCALE641; (1999)5SCC108; [1999]3SCR562

to CPLR 7510 and 7514 that the award of the arbitrator, Lalit Mehta, dated October 31, 1990 is hereby confirmed and shall constitute a judgment of this Court provided however, that payment by A.D. Development Ltd. to

State of H.P. Vs. H.P. State Recognised and Aided Schools Managing Com ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(8)SC406; 1995(3)SCALE400; (1995)4SCC507; [1995]Supp1SCR297; 1995(3)SLJ95(SC); 1995(2)LC311(SC)

question for consideration is whether the teachers employed in various recognised aided private schools in the State of Himachal Pradesh are entitled to the pay-scales which are being paid to their counter-parts in the Government schools? If