Grounds - Judgment Search Results

Globe Ground India Employees Union Vs. Lufthansa German Airlines

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4076-4077 OF2019[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)Nos.25341-42 of 2017]. Globe Ground India Employees Union ... Appellant Versus Lufthansa German Airlines & Anr. ... Respondents JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy,J.1. 2.

Keller Ground Engineering India (P) Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner (Arrear ...

Court: Kerala

ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: KELLER GROUND ENGINEERING INDIA (P) LTD XII-118A AND XIIB, BLAYI PARAMBIL COMPLEX, CHERANALLUR P.O, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY Y.L BADRA RAJU,

Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Association and ors. Vs. St ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3400

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. The Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Association alongwith its three members (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners') has filed this writ

“no Ground Is Made out for Interference in the Vs. Sandeep Sharma an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

court in C.R.No.2696 o”2. Rs.No.4479 of 2010. Same was dismissed on May 24, 2011 observing as follows:- “No ground is made out for interference in the concurrent finding of fact. The appeal is dismissed. However, the appellant

Globe Ground India Employees Union vs.lufthansa German Airlines and Ot ...

Court: Delhi

the persons involved in the litigation, for the dispute to be finally determined. These questions are decided on grounds of justice and convenience in the given factual matrix of a particular case (see Razia Begum Vs. Sahebzadi

Chief Engineer, Ground Water Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Swc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

and boring machinery. In addition to the plea on merits the learned counsel pleads financial hardship on the ground of drought and substantiate this plea with reference to economy circular of the Government of Rajasthan issued in

Apm Industries Ltd vs Central Ground Water Authority & Anr.

Court: Delhi

APPL. 6858/2026APM INDUSTRIES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate; Mr. Arvind Rudhra, Advocate; Mr. Saurabh Panwar, Advocates.versusCENTRAL GROUND WATER AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar (SPC) ,Mr. Sarthak Rana(G.P)CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR

Eapen Varghese vs the Ground Water Department Alappuzha Rep by the Dis ...

Court: Kerala

GRACE VILLA, ERAVANKARA P.O.,THAZHAKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT -690 108BY ADVS. S.SHANAVAS KHAN S.INDU RESPONDENTS: 1 THE GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT DISTRICT OFFICE SANATHANAPURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT OFFICER 2 THE THAZHAKKARA

Alexander Cheriyan vs Director, Ground Water Department

Court: Kerala

ALEXANDER CHERIYAN AGED 68 YEARS KADAVIL, THUMPAMON NORTH P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SRI.ASWIN.P.JOHN RESPONDENTS: 1 DIRECTOR, GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT JALA VIJNAN BHAVAN, IIIRD FLOOR, AMBALAMUKKU, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003. 2 DISTRICT OFFICER GROUND

Anuradha Kaushik and ors. Vs. Varun Ground Water Development Corporati ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: I(2007)ACC305; 2007ACJ2877

Appeal No. 609 of 2003 disputing its liability and the legal representatives of the owner of respondent Varun Ground Water Development Corporation and the driver have also filed cross-objections disputing their liability.2. Brief facts of the case