Grind - Judgment Search Results

Raipur Grinding Industries Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000(56)DRJ253

ORDERArijit Pasayat, C.J.1. Petitioner challenges order passed by the Central Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal (in short, CEGAT) in Appeal No. E/2951/98-C 2000 (124) E.L.T. 1036 (T). Issue before the CEGAT was whether the petitioner...

M/S. Grinding Mills and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another

Court: Rajasthan

on the mineral. In turn, the raw mineral felspar, quartz and other mineral are processed/converted into powder by grinding and supplied/sold in the open market/to other industries in the State of Rajasthan or other States in India.

Baroda Mineral Grinding Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. The representative of the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal, which is not opposed by the department.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Micrometic Grinding Technology Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)9STJ76CESTATNew(Delhi)

and assistance, provide the complete design documentation besides training to enable Licensee to manufacture and sell CNC Internal Grinding Machines of Polar model and its variants The Licensor for the period of this agreement, grants to the

Jaypee Ayodhya Grinding Operations Vs. C.C.E., Allahabad

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Per M. Veeraiyan: Heard both sides. 2. The impugned order upheld the order of the original authority disallowing the credit of Rs.3,59,420/- in respect of spares for cement mill and cement silo which were taken treating...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajeev Grinding Mills

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)192CTR(Del)84; [2005]279ITR86(Delhi)

Rs. 1,03,12,267 made by the AO on account of sale of spices excessively claimed by the assessed as grinding loss ?(b) Whether Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition when the accounts maintained by the assessed did

M/S Annapurna Grindings and Calc Vs. Central Bank of India and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.- 5378 of 2008 M/s Annapurna Grindings and Calcinations Plant at Village Marrar, Ramgarh Cantt. Ramgarh through its proprietor Barid Baran Banerjee, son of late

M/S. Raipur Grinding Industries Corporation Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001(73)ECC677; 2002(144)ELT9(Del)

ORDERArijit Pasayat, CJ.1. Petitioner challenges order passed by the Central Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal (in short, CEGAT) in appeal No. E/2951/98-C. Issue before the CEGAT was whether the petitioner was fixing the brand name...

Panchu Lal Vs. Ajmer Mineral and Grinding Corp. and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2008(4)Raj3397

petitioner in short is that he was employed by the management of respondent No. 1 (Ajmer Mineral and Grinding Corporation) in the year 1954. He continuously working till 11.6.1997.3. On 12.6.1997 when he was going to attend

Ms.Leo Coffee Grinding Works Vs. D.Mohanalakshmi.

Court: Chennai

Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the Judgment and decree dated 15.12.2009 made in RCA.787 of 2004 on the file of the VIII Small Causes...