Grid - Judgment Search Results

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Kamlesh Kumar Chimanbhai Patel ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5396 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.30704 OF2013]. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS KAMLESH KUMAR CHIMANBHAI PATEL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5470 OF2016[@

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribu ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.684 OF2007POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA ...APPELLANT VERSUS TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION ...RESPONDENTS CO. LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC WITH

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited versus Madhya Pradesh Power Tr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2062

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 2062 : 2025 INSC 697Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Limited & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 6847 of

Grid Corporation of Orissa and ors. Vs. Rasananda Das

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC4599; 97(2004)CLT244(SC); [2004(102)FLR149]; JT2003(Suppl1)SC497; (2004)IILLJ1053SC; 2003(8)SCALE129; (2003)10SCC297; 2004(1)SLJ259(SC); (2003)3UPLBEC2699

by the High Court accepting the plea of the respondents as regards higher scales of pay and pension, Grid Corporation of Orissa Limited and others are in appeal in these appeals. Necessary facts required for the disposal

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Aes Corporation and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)352; (2003)1CALLT50(SC); JT2002(8)SC203; (2003)1MLJ51(SC); (2002)7SCC736a; 2003(1)LC40(SC)

parties hereby irrevocablysubmit to the jurisdiction of the appropriate courts inOrissa. 28.3 Any dispute, question or difference arisingbetween GRIDCO (Petitioner) and the Investors(respondents 1 and 2) in connection with thisagreement or otherwise in regard to the relationship

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008AIRSCW7294; 2008LC(SC)511; [2008(4)JCR10(SC)]; 2008(11)SCALE313; 2008(2)LC1095(SC)

the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act') on 28.2.2006. The prayers inter- alia were under: (a) Direct GRIDCO to adhere to the maximum trading margin of 4 paise while entering into a contract for sale of

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. and ors.Vs. Eastern Metals and Ferro A ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

establishment of the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (`Commission' for short).2.3) Section 13 of the Act provided that the Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (`GRIDCO' for short, the appellant herein) incorporated with the main object of engaging in

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. and anr. Vs. Balasore Technical School

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC2262; 89(2000)CLT5(SC); JT1999(2)SC480; (1999)122PLR286; 1999(2)SCALE327; (2000)9SCC552

Matched in: Parties Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. and anr. Vs. Balasore Technical School

Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. Vs. M/S. Indian Charge Chrome Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IVAD(SC)488; AIR1998SC1761; 1998(1)ARBLR589(SC); 86(1998)CLT392(SC); JT1998(4)SC43; 1998(3)SCALE539; (1998)5SCC438; [1998]3SCR375

of by this Judgment3. The brief facts leading to the present controversy may be summarised as under:-(3) The GRID Corporation of Orissa Ltd., (for short 'the GRIDCO') is the appellant in all these appeals whereas M/S Indian

Chairman, Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (Gridco) and ors. Vs. Smt. S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: II(1999)ACC432; 1999AIHC3412; JT1999(7)SC109; (1999)123PLR569; 1999(5)SCALE539; (1999)7SCC298; [1999]Supp2SCR458; 1999(2)LC1557(SC)

electric line. It was further averred that the electric wire had snapped because of the negligence of the GRIDCO and its officers (the appellants) in not properly maintaining the electricity transmission line and, therefore, they were liable