Granitic - Judgment Search Results
Aggarwal Granite Exports Limited, Bangalore Vs. South India Granite Co ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)KarLJ433
ORDER1. The original Company Petition No. 63 of 1997 was filed on 16-6-1997 and the petitioner had prayed for an...
Mayuri Granites Rep. by R.D.K., Aditan Vs. Venkateswara Granites Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)ALT591
Y.V. Narayana, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 21 of 1995 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Warangal...
Tvl. Sundaram Granites, Rep. by Its Managing Partner V. Nalliappan Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-1997
Reported in: 1997(2)CTC678
of the arguments are as follows:-3. The petitioner deals in granite quarries. The petitioner applied for lease to quarry in Survey
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Archean Granites Ltd. Vs. Rps Benefit Fund Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-09-2010
Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE852
ORDER1. Leave granted. Heard the counsel.2. The first respondent Company (`Company' for short), was the owner of an odd shaped...
Tvl Sundaram Granites Vs. Imperial Granities Ltd and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-13-1999
Reported in: AIR1999SC3835; JT1999(8)SC201; 1999(6)SCALE557; (1999)8SCC150
this case relates to grant of lease for quarrying coloured granite under the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 (for
Gem Granites Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-23-2004
Reported in: (2004)192CTR(SC)481; [2004]271ITR322(SC); 2004(9)SCALE647; (2005)1SCC289
Ruma Pal, J.1. The appellant exports granite. According to the appellant the granite is cut and polished
Hindustan Granites Vs. Union of India and (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(117)ECC329; 2007LC329(SC); 2007(5)SCALE587; [2007]80SCL449(SC)
be mentioned. It is stated on behalf of M/s Hindustan Granites that they have accumulated wastes which they are entitled to
Hindustan Granites Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-10-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC1207; 2007(2)SCALE29
be mentioned. It is stated on behalf of M/s Hindustan Granites that they have accumulated wastes which they are entitled to
Oriental Select Granite Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-11-2007
Reported in: 2007(14)SCALE117
the petitioners were asked to pay the value of the granite excavated and transported by them during the period August 27,
Pallava Granite Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-07-2006
Reported in: JT2006(10)SC318; 2006(11)SCALE511
Later on, it was realised that these lands had galaxy granites and, therefore, proposals were made by the Collector, District Prakasam,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free