Gramophone - Judgment Search Results

Gramophone Co., of India Ltd. Vs. Mars Recording Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)218; AIR2001SC2885; 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)539; JT2001(7)SC352; 2001(6)SCALE73; (2002)2SCC103

Matched in: Parties Gramophone Co., of India Ltd. Vs. Mars Recording Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

The Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Customs, Calcutt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(67)ECC23; 1999(114)ELT770(SC); JT1999(9)SC275; 1999(7)SCALE205; (2000)1SCC549

Matched in: Parties The Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Customs, Calcutta

Gramophone Company of India Ltd. Vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC667; 1985(1)ARBLR361(SC); (1984)1CompLJ362(SC); 1984(2)ECC142; 1984(1)SCALE338; (1984)2SCC534; [1984]2SCR664; 1984(16)LC475(SC); MANU/SC/0187/1984

the questions which arise for consideration in this appeal.2. The questions have arisen this way: The appellant, the Gramophone Company of India Limited, is a well-known manufacturer of musical records and cassettes. By agreement with the performing

Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1195; 1996(53)ECC32; 1994LC493(SC); 1994(74)ELT490(SC); 1995Supp(4)SCC755

as it then stood. The Revision filed by the appellant was dismissed.2. The appellant is a manufacturer of Gramophone records in India. For the said purpose, it says, it used to import Poly Vinyl Chloride (P.V.C.) L.P.

S.P. Gramophone Company Vs. C.i.T., Patiala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC1152; (1986)51CTR(SC)104; 1986LC28(SC); [1986]158ITR313(SC); 1986(1)SCALE137; (1986)2SCC1; [1986]1SCR164; 1986(2)LC169(SC)

Matched in: Parties S.P. Gramophone Company Vs. C.i.T., Patiala

Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Mars Recording Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Karnataka

16).12. The learned counsel for the appellant has also drawn my attention to the decision reported in The Gramophone Company of India Limited Versus Super Cassette Industries Lid. (1999 PTC 2 (Del) wherein it is held:'Three distinct

The Gramophone Company of India Ltd Vs Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

the Act, which do not admit of any ambiguity in their interpretation. The Supreme Court has held in Gramophone Company of India Limited v. Birender Bahadur Pandey & Ors., AIR 1984 SC 667 (hereinafter referred to as

S.P. Gramophone Company Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1986)54CTR(P& H)252; [1986]160ITR417(P& H)

Matched in: Parties S.P. Gramophone Company Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Gramophone Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IIAD(Delhi)905; 1995(1)ARBLR555(Delhi); 58(1995)DLT99; 1995(33)DRJ333

(i) of section 14 of the Copyright Act (hereinafter called the Act). However, first the facts. (2) The Gramophone Company of India Limited which is the plaintiff before me had produced audio records titled Hum Aapke Hain

Gramophone Company of India Limited Vs. Baleswar and Another

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1990Cal6

shall include speech, singing playing on instrument whether alone or with another or others. 'RECORD' shall mean a gramophone record magnetic tape (whether reel to reel endless loop in cassette or cartridge form or otherwise howsoever) or