Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed section 68 vacation of seates Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 13 results (0.059 seconds)

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... state of hyderabad. the offices declared by it as not disqualifying their holders included offices of profit under the government of india and under the governments of all the other states. the question whether a legislation like the hyderabad act made by the legislature of a state for the purpose of declaring certain offices of profit, as not disqualifying their holders for its membership could properly be regarded as a law having ..... . the meaning of the words 'ordinarily resident' occurring in the above section is explained by section 20 of that act.57. but, an elector, though eligible for election under the provisions of the representation of the people act, stands disqualified if he holds an office of profit, whether he holds such office under the government of india or under the government of a state.58. the hyderabad act did not remove from the ambit of such disqualification only those offices held under the erstwhile .....

John B. James and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4134; 2001(1)KarLJ364

..... question is not res integra.25. in lakhi narayan das v province of bihar, the federal court considered a similar question with reference to sections 88 and 107 of the government of india act, 1935 (corresponding to articles 213 and 254 of the constitution of india]. section 88 of the government of india act read as follows:'(1) if at any time when the legislature of a province is not in session the governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take ..... was covered entirely by items 1 and 2 in the provincial list and as, for no part of those provisions, it was necessary to have recourse to the concurrent powers provided for in list iii, the question of repugnancy under section 107(1) of the government of india act would not arise. it then proceeded to examine as to what could be the position if the provisions of the ordinance also came within the purview of item 2 of the concurrent list and observed thus:'. . . .the concurrent list is not a forbidden .....

J Venkatesh Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... zones (nimz) as designated in the national manufacturing policy (nmp). the acquisition notifications issued by the state government under the kiad act have referred to nimz. thus, it is clear that the state government has implemented the nimz contemplated by the central government, through national manufacturing policy-2011, which is also adopted by the state government vide its government order dated 27.2.2015. the government of india, ministry of commerce and industry, department of industrial policy and promotion (dipp) has declared a national manufacturing ..... rao reported at 1973 (1) scc500paras28, 29, 30 and 31.) the position is further fortified by the fact that under section 3(za) of the 2013 act, public purpose means activities specified under section 2(1). section 2(1) includes the activities listed in the notification of the government of india dated 27.03.2012. the notification dated 27.03.2012 includes within it infrastructure development which inter-alia specifies common .....

J. Venkatesh Reddy and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

..... zones (nimz) as designated in the national manufacturing policy (nmp). the acquisition notifications issued by the state government under the kiad act have referred to nimz. thus, it is clear that the state government has implemented the nimz contemplated by the central government, through national manufacturing policy-2011, which is also adopted by the state government vide its government order dated 27.2.2015. the government of india, ministry of commerce and industry, department of industrial policy and promotion (dipp) has declared a national manufacturing policy ..... rao, 1973(1) scc 500 paras28, 29, 30 and 31. the position is further fortified by the fact that under section 3(za) of the 2013 act, public purpose means activities specified under section 2(1). section 2(1) includes the activities listed in the notification of the government of india dated 27.03.2012. the notification dated 27.03.2012 includes within it infrastructure development, which inter-alia specifies common .....

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . karnataka state legislature has enacted the kiad act and the said act has received assent of the president of india. section 47 of the kiad act provides that the provisions of the kiad act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein with any other law. (b) it was contended by the petitioners in the said case that 2013 act, inter alia, provides for acquisition of lands for industrial areas and the provisions of the 2013 act (central act) totally takes away the power of state governments, hitherto exercised under the state acts for acquisition of lands for industrial areas. therefore, the provisions .....

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... e is a copy of the award produced by the petitioners in w.p.no.15967- 15969/2017. it was approved on 20/05/2002. the award reads as under: ________________________ award under section 11 of the land acquisition act. ________________________ government of karnataka bangalore development authority, bangalore in the office of the special land acquisition officer bangalore district1 land acquisition case no.51/85-86 2. name of the project nagarabhavi layout i stage 3. preliminary ..... park, but not in the case of tata housing development company in w.p.25807/2004. (c) in the case of the union of india and others vs. m/s.anglo afghan agencies etc., [air1968sc718, it has been held that even if the case does not fall within the limits of section 115 of evidence act, it is open to the party who acted on the representation of the government to claim that the government should carry out - 198 - the promise made by it in the formal contract as required by the constitution. in the same judgment, it is .....

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vested with the bda. this fact is evident from the award passed by the land acquisition officer and mahazar copy to evidence the fact that possession of the land was taken and 16(2) notification of the land acquisition act is published, which document is evidenced the factum of taking possession by the state government and transferred the same to b.d.a. and therefore the schedule land vests with the b.d.a. the finding on issue no.3 by the trial court treating it as preliminary issue is erroneous in law in ..... judges in light of their own views as to policy unless it is shown to adopt a purposive interpretation of the statute, which does not arise in the instant case.-. 81 - 41. in this context, harbhajan singh vs. press council of india reported in air2002sc1351could be relied upon wherein, cross on statutory interpretation (third edition, 1995) has been relied upon as follows:- thus, an ordinary meaning or grammatical meaning does not imply that the judge attributes a meaning to the words .....

Capt Chethan Y K (retd) Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... learned counsel for the parties at admission stage itself.47. the petitioner before this court has filed the present petition for quashment of the government of india notification bearing no.3872(e), dated 29.10.2019 in exercise of the powers conferred under section 41 of the arms act, 1959 in supercession of the notification of government of india, dated 6.7.1963. the aforesaid notification of the government of india, exempts every person of coorg by race and every jamma tenure-holder in coorg from the ambit of sections 3 and 4 of the arms ..... under; new delhi, the 26th december 1966 s.o.3979 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 41 of the arms act, 1959 (54 of 1959), the central government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the government of india in the ministry of home affairs no.s.o.1920 dated the 6th july, 1963, published in the gazette of india, part ii, section 3, sub-section (ii) dated the 13th july, 1963, namely: - 4 0 - 40 - amendment in .....

Indian Sugars and Refineries Ltd. Hospet, Dist. Bellary (Mysore) and a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1968Kant332; AIR1968Mys332; ILR1968KAR449

..... :54. tax on sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers.(12) in madras state v. gannon dunkerley & co. ltd., : [1959]1scr379 the expression 'sale of goods', occurring in entry 48 in list ii of schedule vii to the government of india act, 1935, came up for interpretation. venkatarama iyer, j., who spoke for the court, said that 'sale in entry 48 must be construed as having the same meaning which it has in the sale of goods ..... advert to the decision cited by the learned counsel bearing on the question whether the regulations and control on a transaction would take it out of the ambit of sale within the meaning of the sale of goods act.51. in new india sugar mills ltd. v. commissioner of sales tax. : air1963sc1207 the validity of levy of sales tax on sugar supplied by a sugar factory to the government of madras, was challenged by that factory. the course of dealings between the factory and the state of madras has been set out in the judgment of the supreme court thus at page 1210:'the .....

H.R. Patel Vs. C.G. Venkatalakshamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant65; AIR1955Mys65

..... content--the jurisdiction and power of the court without which justice cannot be administered. he has also referred to the anomalies and difficulties attendant upon such an interpretation. 31. that decision is of course based on the provisions of the government of india act and the powers of the various legislatures given under it. those items are now determent under the'constitution, and the 'constitution' and 'organization' of the high courts and the special powers of the high court granted under the constitution has ..... shall be the same as immediately before the commencement of the constitution. the meaning of the expression 'administration of justice' has been the subject of discussion in : [1951]2scr51 (t), which was a case arising out of provisions similar to those of the government of india act, and mahajan j. has observed at page 83: 'it seems to me that the legislative power conferred on the provincial legislature by item 1 of list ii has been conferred by use of language which .....