Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-27-1960
Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766
..... under the erstwhile state of hyderabad. the offices declared by it as not disqualifying their holders included offices of profit under the government of india and under the governments of all the other states. the question whether a legislation like the hyderabad act made by the legislature of a state for the purpose of declaring certain offices of profit, as not disqualifying their holders ..... :-'whereas it is expedient to repeal and re-enact with modifications the hydera-preamble.bad legislative assembly (prevention of disqualification) act, 1951 with a view to declare that certain offices of profit under the government of india or the government of any state should not, under certain conditions, disqualify, or be deemed to have disqualified the holders thereof for being chosen as, or for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-16-1960
Reported in : AIR1961Kant257; AIR1961Mys257
..... of all courts (except the supreme court) with respect to the same.6. once this result is reached, the provisions of article 254 (corresponding to section 107 of the government of india act, 1935) cease to be of relevance. the doctrine of repugnancy propounded in that article applies only in respect of matters enumerated in the concurrent list and can have no bearing ..... of schedule vii of the constitution corresponding to entry 13 of the provincial list ii appended to schedule vii of the government of india act of 1935 which was the constitution act at the relevant period.the provincial legislative list of the 1935 government of india act also contains two other entries which are relevant for our present purpose. they are entry 2--'jurisdiction and powers of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-28-1960
Reported in : AIR1961Kant44; AIR1961Mys44; 1961CriLJ285
..... the several witnesses. subsequently the investigation was conducted by dy. s.p. who succeeded mr. chellappa in november 1957. after obtaining the necessary sanction from the government and the inspector-general of registration the appellant and nanjiah, the peon attached to his office were both prosecuted for offences punishable under section 161 of the indian ..... penal code and section 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act (act ii of 1947) by presenting a charge to the court of the special judge, civil station bangalore. the appellant and nanjiah, (second accused before the trial ..... 1 of 1958 convicting the appellant. g. moogappa of offences under section 161 of the indian penal code and section 5 (2) of the prevention of corruption act (act ii of 1947) and sentencing him to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and also to pay a fine of rs. 500/- on each of the counts and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-10-1960
Reported in : 1962CriLJ832
..... area, a transit pass is necessary.5. rule 66 referred to by the learned judge {which both sides agree is rule 66 framed by the government of bombay under section 41 of the act) states:no forest-produce shall be moved into, or from, or within any district of the state of bombay, except as hereinafter provided; without ..... from', there can hardly be any doubt that both of them indicate the forest to be the source or original depository of the forest produce in question. the learned government pleader has very strenuously contended that the expression 'found in' a forest merely means 'come across' or 'discovered' in a forest irrespective of the fact whether the ..... forest or some other place which is not a forest. all that is necessary, according to the learned government pleader, is that somebody (meaning apparently a forest officer or a forest guard or other person acting under the authority of the act or rules) finds or discovers these goods within, the area of a forest same argument, however, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-21-1960
Reported in : ILR1960KAR525; [1960]11STC411(Kar)
..... within the state of mysore and consumed by the supply department. it is not disputed by sri srinivasa iyengar that the director-general of supplies and disposals, government of india, new delhi, placed orders for supply of cement with the first petitioners at bangalore, that the first petitioners in turn directed one of the factories of ..... was payable on the said turnover as the sales did not fall within the purview of the mysore sales tax act being inter-state transactions and the supplies to the director-general of supplies and disposals, government of india, new delhi, were done in the course of inter-state trade and commerce. the sales tax officer rejected the ..... bangalore in the state of mysore and are registered as a dealer under the mysore sales tax act. the petitioners supplied cement to the members of the public and also to the director-general of supplies and disposals, government of india, new delhi, or to such persons authorised by the said office for consumption within the state .....
Tag this Judgment!