Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed section 68 vacation of seates Page 1 of about 328 results (0.260 seconds)

Ram Kirpal Bhagat and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC951; 1971(0)BLJR689; 1970CriLJ875; (1969)3SCC471; [1970]3SCR233

..... the power to apply to scheduled areas central laws or provincial laws enacted prior to the constitution.27. prior to the constitution section 92 of the government of india act, 1935 conferred power on the governor to make regulations for excluded and partially excluded areas which included the santhal parganas. in making such regulation the ..... that the power to make regulations did not confer power on the governor to apply any law. it was said that under section 92 of the government of india act, 1935 the governor could do so but under the fifth schedule of the constitution the governor is not competent to apply laws. this argument is without ..... santhal parganas either under the santhal parganas settlement regulation of 1872 or under any notification issued under section 92 of the government of india act, 1935. neither the sea customs act, 1878 nor the land customs act, 1924 has been specifically made applicable to the santhal parganas by any notification under sub-clause (2) of clause 5 .....

Mohan Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1979All170

..... publish in any court of justice any laws or regulations made by the said governor-general in council.'this act continued till the government of india act, 1915 repealed it. section 130 of the government of india act, 1915 provides:3. the acts specified in the fourth schedule to this act are hereby repealed to the extent mentioned in the third column of that schedule :provided that this repeal ..... general order no. 179 dated september 12, 1836. the order does not indicate the source of power. the source of power can, however, be traced to the government of india act, 1833. section 43 of this act provided that the said governor-general in council shall have the power to make laws and regulations tor repealing, amending or altering any laws and regulations whatever .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... in article 395" indicate that the laws in force contemplated by article 372 are those laws which were framed under the repealed indian independence act, 1947 and the government of india act, 1935 or similar other legislative enactments or orders made under the provisions of constitutions of erstwhile indian states. such legislative enactments or orders ..... by the people but it came into force, by virtue of article 394, on january 26, 1950. article 395 repealed the indian independence act, 1947 and the government of india act, 1935.1162. reference may also be made to the fact that during the debates in the constituent assembly it was pointed out by many ..... if the word 'amendment' was of doubtful import. 2152. on august 21, 1946, the constituent assembly passed the government of india (third amendment) act, 1949, which substituted a new section 291 in the government of india act, 1935 giving to the governor general the power to make such amendments as he considered necessary, whether by way of .....

Cdr. Anil Prabhakar Koshti and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR146; 2000(1)BomCR781; 2000(2)MhLj198

..... principles adopted at the said convention. whatever might have been the objective behind the erstwhile section 80(2) of the act, it is now clear that the government of india had to comply with its obligations under the convention which had been ratified. this was the reason why parliament decided to repeal section 80 ..... . according to the submission of the learned additional solicitor general, navy order nos. 20 of 1974 and 11 of 1986 stipulated the test by which the government of india could decide whether a person was fit or unfit for a service certificate, even if he was entitled to the said certificate.16. in our view, ..... on the standards of training, certification and watch keeping for seafarers, which was adopted in 1978, which convention the government of india had ratified on 16th november 1984. as from that date, the government of india was obliged to ensure that the certification of seafarers officers at different levels had to be strictly in accordance with the .....

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Seth Jagamander Das and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1954SC683

..... the 5th of january 1948 no fresh proceedings could be commenced after that date for violation of the provisions of the defence of india act.section 102(4) of the government of india act, under the provisions of which possibly the prosecution of the respondents for offences committed by them could have been justified and continued, ..... commenced on the 16th january 1950 on the ground that the trial could not be continued because the defence of india act and the rules framed thereunder had expired and because the government of india act, 1935 had also been repealed by the constitution. the magistrate refused to quash these proceedings. the judgment giving the ..... ourselves there are no adequate grounds for reversing that judgment and for allowing the appeal.6. the defence of india act was enacted in exercise of the powers granted under section 102 of the government of india act, 1935. the control order under which the respondents were being prosecuted related to a subject contained in the .....

Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited, Rep by its Authori ...

Court : Chennai

..... packing accessories in an unit located in madras special economic zone, tambaram, chennai and other special economic zones in the state of tamil nadu notified by the government of india or for development, operation and maintenance of special economic zone by the developer of the special economic zone, if such registered dealer has been authorised to establish ..... only for the above mentioned purpose. this amendment came to be notified in exercise of the powers under section 17(1), as the government had enacted the tamil nadu sez act, tamil nadu act 18 of 2005, which came into force on 08.08.2005. the only reason assigned by the respondent, assessing officer is by referring ..... same.) 1. in these writ petitions, the petitioner have challenged the assessment orders passed by the third respondent under the provisions of the tamil nadu value added tax act (tnvat act), for the assessment years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, dated 30.10.2015. since the issue involved in all .....

Adivasis For Social And Human Rights Action Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the appellant has relied upon the decisions of the federal court in the cases of raja bahadur1 and chhaturam2. both the decisions deal with section 92 of the government of india act, 1935, which reads thus: administration of excluded areas and partially excluded areas:92. (1) the executive authority of a province extends to excluded and partially ..... being, an excluded area, exercise his functions in his discretion. (emphasis added) 10. by virtue of article 395, the government of india act, 1935 has been repealed. sub section (1) of section 92 of the government of india act, 1935 and sub clause (1) of clause 5 of the fifth schedule are completely different. sub section (1) of section ..... by the hon ble governor issuing a specific direction to that effect. thus, the reliance placed on sub section (1) of section 92 of the government of india act, 1935 is not at all relevant.11. the contention raised by the appellant that unless there is a specific notification issued by the hon ble governor .....

R. Karuppan Vs. R. Namachivayam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(99)ELT214(Mad)

..... shooter enabling him for importing shooting gear like guns etc., on concessional rate of duty and he imported shooting gears availing the concession accorded by the government india and for the sake of battering his shooting skills. he had imported 2 guns and 5,000 rounds of ammunitions as baggage in 1991. the then ..... . collector of customs from an officer not below the rank of a deputy secretary in the department of youth affairs and sports, ministry of human resource development, government of india indicating - (i) the description, quantity and value of the said goods; (ii) that the importer is a sports person of outstanding eminence; and (iii ..... india. under chapter 15, part i, prohibited items are dealt with. under part ii of the said chapter, restricted items are dealt with. 32. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 of the imports and exports (control) act, 1947, the central government notified on 31-3-1992, the export and import policy for the period 1992-97. this act .....

Sarbananda Sonowal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2920; JT2005(6)SC79; (2005)5SCC665

..... to make rules requiring that persons entering india shall be in possession of passports and for all matters ancillary or incidental ..... central government as early as in 1950. the imdt act instead of maintaining peace has only revived internal disturbance.41. another important enactment, whose provisions have been superseded by section 4 of the imdt act, is the passport (entry into india) act, 1920. sub-section (1) of section 3 of this act conferred power upon the central government ..... bir singh, director, ministry of home affairs. in paragraph 7 of this affidavit, it was stated that a proposal to repeal the imdt act is under consideration of government of india. a copy of the reply given by shri i.d. swami, minister of state in the ministry of home affairs in the rajya sabha .....

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... under the erstwhile state of hyderabad. the offices declared by it as not disqualifying their holders included offices of profit under the government of india and under the governments of all the other states. the question whether a legislation like the hyderabad act made by the legislature of a state for the purpose of declaring certain offices of profit, as not disqualifying their holders ..... :-'whereas it is expedient to repeal and re-enact with modifications the hydera-preamble.bad legislative assembly (prevention of disqualification) act, 1951 with a view to declare that certain offices of profit under the government of india or the government of any state should not, under certain conditions, disqualify, or be deemed to have disqualified the holders thereof for being chosen as, or for .....