Governing Board - Judgment Search Results

TRACY ALISON SKOLES Vs Chairperson of Governing Board

Court: Chennai

AND W.M.P. NOS. 9237 TO 9239 OF 2026 Tracy Alison Skoles .. Petitioner - Vs -1. Chairperson of Governing Board Auroville Foundation Auroville, Tamil Nadu 605 101.2. Auroville Foundation OfÏce Rep. By its Secretary Auroville Foundation Auroville, Tamil … of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Board Resolution passed in the 66th Meeting of the Governing Board dated 13.02.2024 by the 1st respondent and consequent email dated 17.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary

Tracy Alison Skoles, Vs Chairperson of Governing Board

Court: Chennai

2026 Tracy Alison Skoles, W/o. Jonah Skoles, No.1, Pillar Koil Street, Ganapathychettikulam, Calapet, Puducherry-605014. Appellant(s) Vs1. Chairperson of Governing Board Auroville Foundation, Aurovile, Tamil Nadu - 605101.2. Auroville Foundation Office, Rep by its Secretary, Auroville Foundation, Auroville, Tamil … appellant herein filed writ petition seeking to quash the Board Resolution passed in the 66th Meeting of the Governing Board dated 13.2.2024 of the first respondent and the consequent email dated 17.2.2026.3. The learned Single Judge, by order

The Kanyakumari Diocese of the Church of South India, Represented by R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1998)1MLJ622

Matched in: Parties The Kanyakumari Diocese of the Church of South India, Represented by Rev. M.i. Kesari, Bishop and the Chairman of the Governing Board Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Priti Jaiswal D/O Shri Mewa Lal Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Thr ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3688

particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. Section 4; Compulsory Acquisition of Land Powers of State Government Held, Renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of State Government of compulsory … counsel submits that re-evaluation of marks requires expenses and about 10% of the total candidates appearing in the Board's examination, apply for scrutiny and 13% of total may apply for re-evaluation.6. In many cases before the Court,