Gopal Singh V State - Judgment Search Results

The State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas.

Court: Supreme Court of India

IPC and the MV Act, since both the statutes operate with full vigour, in their own independent 11 Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand, (2013) 7 SCC545: (2013) 3 SCC (Cri) 608 12 State of Karnataka v. Sharanappa Basanagouda Aregoudar

Shri Ram Sahu (dead) Through Lrs Vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat

Court: Supreme Court of India

arisen but the same by itself may not be a ground for filing an application for review.34. In Gopal Singh v. State Cadre Forest Officers’ Assn., (2007) 9 SCC369this Court held that after rejecting the original application filed by the

Jaswinder Singh (dead) Through Legal Representative Vs. Navjot Singh S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

have to be equally protected14. It would be useful to rely on the observations of this Court in Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand15 that just punishment is the collective cry of the society and while collective cry has to

P. Maruthi Prasada Rao versus the State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1150

be granted any relief in respect of past exercises undertaken for promotion. [Paras 10, 13, 20-22]Case Law Cited Gopal Singh v. State Cadre Forest Officer’s Association [2007] 6 SCR 586 : (2007) 9 SCC 369; P.S. Sadasivaswamy v. State of

Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan versus State of (Nct of Delhi) & Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2012

(2000) 3 SCC 394; Poonam Lata v. M.L. Wadhawan [1987] 2 SCR 1123 : (1987) 3 SCC 347; Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand [2013] 4 SCR 104 : (2013) 7 SCC 545; Bhola Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh[2022] 7

Shyam NaraIn Vs. State of Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

society and the other objects frequently receive only secondary consideration when sentences are being decided”. (emphasis supplied)”15. In Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand[4]., while dealing with the philosophy of just punishment which is the collective cry of the society,

The State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Kamal Sengupta and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(4)AWC3764(SC); 2008(56)BLJR2317; (2009)1CALLT21(SC); JT2008(8)SC317; 2008(3)SLJ209(SC)

arisen but the same by itself may not be a ground for filing an application for review.27. In Gopal Singh v. State Cadre Forest Officers' Assn. and Ors. : (2007)9SCC369 , this Court held that after rejecting the original application

Jitendra @ Kalla Vs. State of Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

(i) State of M.P. v. Babulal [AIR2008SC582; (ii) Jameel v. State of Uttar Pradesh; [(2010) 12 SCC532 (iii) Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand [2013 (2) SCALE533 (iv) Dulla and Ors. v. State [AIR1958All 198]. Criminal Appeal No.2133 of 2017

State of H.P. Vs. Nirmala Devi

Court: Supreme Court of India

of the collective for justice which includes adequate punishment cannot be lightly ignored.” 16. Recently, this Court in Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand [(2013) 7 SCC545: (2013) 3 SCC (Cri) 608 : JT (2013) 3 SC444 held as under:

Raj Bala Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bala ... Appellant Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.1. In Gopal Singh v. State of Uttrakahand[1]., while focusing on the gravity of the crime and the concept of proportionality as regards the