Golding V State - Judgment Search Results
Trono Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-04-1905
Apgar, 35 Cal. 389; People v. Gordon, 99 Cal. 227. Florida -- Johnson v. State, 27 Fla. 245; Golding v. State, 31 Fla. 262. Illinois -- Brennan v. People, 15 Ill. 511; Barnett v. People, 54 Ill. 325. Iowa
Gold Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1957
GOLD v. UNITED STATES - 352 U.S. 985 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court GOLD v. UNITED STATES , 352 U.S. … GOLD v. UNITED STATES - 352 U.S. 985 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court GOLD v. UNITED STATES , 352 U.S. 985 (1957) 352
Tarina Sen Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-03-2024
SCC3038 Narendra Lal Jain and others4; (v) Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another5; (vi) Gold Quest International Private Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu and others6; and (vii) Central Bureau of Investigation v. … Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta1; (ii) Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another2; (iii) Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another3; (iv) Central Bureau of Investigation, ACB, Mumbai v. 1 (1996) 5 SCC5912 (2008) 9
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hiralal Babulal Soni versus the State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-2025
Reported in: [2025]2S.C.R.708
and that the accused had knowledge that the property was stolen property. [Para 32] Case Law Cited Trimbak v. State of M.P, AIR 1954 SC 39; Nagendra Sah v. State of Bihar (2021) 10 SCC 725 - relied … arose as regards the sustainability of the conviction of the accused u/s.120B and 411 IPC, when the seized gold bars are not the same gold bars linked to the fraudulent transactions. Headnotes† Penal Code, 1860 - ss.120B,
K. Bharathi Devi Vs. The State Of Telangana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-03-2024
another5; 1 (1996) 5 SCC5912 (2008) 9 SCC6773 (2012) 10 SCC3034 (2014) 5 SCC3645 (2014) 6 SCC4667 (vi) Gold Quest International Private Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu and others6; and (vii) Central Bureau of Investigation v. … Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta1; (ii) Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another2; (iii) Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another3; (iv) Central Bureau of Investigation, ACB, Mumbai v. Narendra Lal Jain and others4; (v)
Kattavellai @ Devakar versus State of Tamilnadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-15-2025
Reported in: [2025] 7 S.C.R. 984
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 984 : 2025 INSC 845 Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamilnadu (Criminal Appeal No. 1672 of 2019) 15 July 2025 [Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol* and Sandeep Mehta, … part with her jewellery and then, approached the victims, and on their refusal to part with money and gold led to their killings - Trial court convicted the appellant and sentenced him to death - Upheld by
Jasmer Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
law and meaning and significance to the ideal of welfare State" - State of Mysore v. Workers of Gold Mines AIR1958SC923"13. In view of the aforesaid statement of law the setting aside of the Award by the
Bhuvnesh Kumar Dwivedi Vs. M/S Hindalco Industries Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
of law and meaning and significance to the ideal of welfare State.” (State of Mysore v. Workers of Gold Mines13, AIR p. 928, para 10.) 18. A careful reading of the judgments reveals that the High Court … ex facie erroneous and contrary to the law laid down in Syed Yakoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan  AIR (1964) SC477 Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab (1976) 2 SCC868#160;P.G.I. of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh v. Raj Kumar  (2001) 2 SCC54 Surya Dev
K.V.S.Ram Vs. Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corp
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-14-2015
of law and meaning and significance to the ideal of welfare State. (State of Mysore v. Workers of Gold Mines, AIR1958SC923at page 928 para 10)"15. Once the Labour Court has exercised the discretion judicially, the High Court
Itc Limited Vs. Blue Coast Hotels Ltd. .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
a proposal for reschedulement 28 Kiran Devi Bansal v. DGM SIDBI, AIR2009Guj 100 (DB)(para 9 and 10); Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. v. State Bank of India, AIR2011Bom. 42 (DB)(para 11, 12 and 13); Vinay Container Services Pvt. … reschedulement 28 Kiran Devi Bansal v. DGM SIDBI, AIR2009Guj 100 (DB)(para 9 and 10); Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. v. State Bank of India, AIR2011Bom. 42 (DB)(para 11, 12 and 13); Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Axis Bank,
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free