Going Concern Value - Judgment Search Results

Mohata Concerns Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(4)JCR725(Jhr)]

compensation as awarded by the Reference Court, the appellant Mohata Concerns Limited has preferred the instant appeal (F.A. No. 37 of that these documents clearly establish and indicate the actual market value of the lands fetched for the adjoining lands of the

Triveni Concerns Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1992)40ITD213(Pune.)

of his order.18. After hearing both the parties and after going through the order of the CIT (Appeals), we find that confirming the reopening of the assessment. While concluding his arguments concerning reassessment, Shri Inamdar pointed out that the CIT (Appeals) should if it was in the interest of the business to value stock solely with reference to cost of raw materials and

Plastic Concern Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

to the interest of Revenue.The CIT further observed that Plastic concern does not have a past history of doing job (work) has been no irregularity in determining and providing for the value of such goods in the books of the assessee in

Concerned Citizens Vs. Pine Creek Cons. Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

Conservancy Districts." The District Court thus did canvass the contentions going to the merits, and decided the issue, albeit on a Concerned Citizens v. Pine Creek Cons. Dist. - 429 U.S. 651

Stringfellow Vs. Concerned Neighbors

Court: US Supreme Court

appealable. I This case is part of the ongoing litigation concerning the Stringfellow Acid Pits, an abandoned hazardous waste disposal site and has alternative means for challenging the order." Ibid. (emphasis added). In explaining what those alternative means are, however, the Court

Champaran Cane Concern Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1737; [1963]49ITR152(SC); [1964]2SCR921

three years, though the assessee claimed that itwas a co-ownership concern belonging to two persons, Padampat Singhania havingRe. 0-4-0 share and association ofpersons or the partners of the firm' were subsequently added in 1924 andthe Indian Income-tax Act makes a distinction in

Concerned Workmen of Sahai Industries Vs. B.D. Gupta and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ165Del

there is an ineffective order of termination, then the workmen concerned continues to be in service with all consequential benefits. It

Sitalpore Colliery Concern Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1957Cal319,61CWN440,[1957]32ITR26(Cal)

is to be conducted. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is expressly laid down that the Appellate Tribunal 'may

Narayani Trading Concern Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1995(80)ELT263(Cal)

India and Nepal.32. Mr. Mullick submitted that if the petitioner concern could satisfy the Customs authorities as to the country of appellant had been unlawfully deprived of the possession of his valuable goods because of the illegal action of the Customs authorities

Public Concern for Governance Trust Charitable Trust Registered Under ...

Court: Mumbai

in this and such transaction, CIDCO has suffered huge losses going into Rs. 35 crores.103. Further, it must be borne in Government and CIDCO to take appropriate actions against the persons concerned so that this kind of deviation does not take place and the cooperative housing societies the difference between the market value and the price charged by Respondent No. 2. As far