Skip to content


Going Concern - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: going concern Page 1 of about 155 results (0.033 seconds)
Jul 27 2007 (HC)

Mohata Concerns Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(4)JCR725(Jhr)]

Agricultural Marketing Board, Patna and endorsement was made by the concerned authorities that the objection would be considered on 15.2.1983. Yet,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1991 (TRI)

Triveni Concerns Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1992)40ITD213(Pune.)

on record and which subsequently came to his notice after going through the records itself, while giving his finding, the CIT of the Act so far as assessment year 1982-83 is concerned. The closing stock that was valued for this year was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1997 (TRI)

Plastic Concern Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

material to Plastic Concern without making enquiry whether the said concern has any previous experience in the manufacture of goods. A

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 1977 (FN)

Concerned Citizens Vs. Pine Creek Cons. Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

Conservancy Districts." The District Court thus did canvass the contentions going to the merits, and decided the issue, albeit on a Citizens v. Pine Creek Cons. Dist., 429 U.S. 651 (1977) Concerned Citizens of Southern Ohio, Inc. v. Pine Creek Conservancy District

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1987 (FN)

Stringfellow Vs. Concerned Neighbors

Court: US Supreme Court

- 480 U.S. 370 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors, 480 U.S. 370 (1987) Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1963 (SC)

Champaran Cane Concern Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1737; [1963]49ITR152(SC); [1964]2SCR921

2. The assessee claimed that the concern was a co-ownership concernbelonging to the two persons above named in the shares already

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 1983 (HC)

Concerned Workmen of Sahai Industries Vs. B.D. Gupta and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ165Del

pointed out that so far as workman Hamir Singh is concerned, matter was compromised during the proceedings before the Labour Court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 1957 (HC)

Sitalpore Colliery Concern Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1957Cal319,61CWN440,[1957]32ITR26(Cal)

is to be conducted. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is expressly laid down that the Appellate Tribunal 'may

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 1995 (HC)

Narayani Trading Concern Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1995(80)ELT263(Cal)

matter of this writ application, and to allow the petitioner concern to transit the same to Nepal in accordance with and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2005 (HC)

Public Concern for Governance Trust Charitable Trust Registered Under ...

Court: Mumbai

accordingly. The Petitioner was aware about the reputation of CIDCO going down and petition quotes in para 16 (F) from the of 2005 that Vineeta Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. was a sister concern of Respondent No. 4 and it sold the commercial shops

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //