Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Get - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1815

Gettings Vs. Burch's Administratrix

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1815

Gettings v. Burch's Administratrix - 13 U.S. 372 (1815) U.S. Supreme Court Gettings v. Burch's Administratrix, 13 U.S. 9


Apr 20 2016

GET Power Limited, Chennai, rep. by its General Manager (F and A), K. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-2016

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records culminating in the joint lender meeting held on 21.07.2015 of the respondents 1 to...


Oct 13 1969

Getting Equipment C. Vs. Bd. of Zon. Appeals of Cleveland

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-13-1969

GETTING EQUIPMENT C. v. BD. OF ZON. APPEALS OF CLEVELAND - 396 U.S. 3 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court GETTING


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 03 2008

John George Proprietor M/S. Crystal, Chennai Vs. M/S. Get It Informe D ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Apr-03-2008

provided that “Getit Yellow Pages will take utmost care in avoiding error and omission in print that however, Getit Yellow Pages will not be responsible for any error or omission in print.”; again as per Clause 11,“any


Aug 20 2013

“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-20-2013

quashed. The terms and conditions of the settlement read as follows:-“1. That both the parties have decided to get their marriage dissolved by mutual consent in accordance with law. The appellant-Jagmeet Singh and Ramandeep Kaur-respondent shall make


Feb 17 2014

“1. Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Get Pension Vs. Pritam Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

the effect that initially the plaintiff filed suit for declaration to the effect that he is entitled to get pension with effect from 31.05.2000 and also to get GPF and other retiral benefits with consequential relief of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial