Generically - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: generically Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 123 results (0.007 seconds)Miller (Appellant) Vs. Mcfarlane (Respondent)
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: May-24-2006
family asset is the husband s very substantial earning power generated over a lengthy marriage in which the couple deliberately chose
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaju Sharma Vs. Mularam and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-08-2006
Reported in: II(2007)ACC178
21 amounting to rs 42 the learned tribunal has very generously awarded rs 5 000 as compensation there is absolutely no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR (on the Application of Gillan (Fc) and Another (Fc)) (Appellants) Vs ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Mar-08-2006
appellants case parliament it is argued cannot have intended the general words of sub section 3 to permit the infringement of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Prakash Mathur Vs. Mohan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-2006
Reported in: II(2007)ACC755
as regards appeal no 667 1995 the learned tribunal has generously awarded rs 5 000 for three simple injuries suffered by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMst. Sugani Vs. Rameshwar Das and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-25-2006
Reported in: AIR2006SC2172; 2006(4)ALD41(SC); 2006(3)AWC2392(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN26; 2006(3)CTC108; [2007(1)JCR218(SC)]; (2006)3MLJ131(SC); 2006(4)SCALE491; (2006)11SCC587
section 100 cpc appears to have been liberally construed and generously applied by some judges of various high courts with the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Assam and ors. Vs. Rimki BuragohaIn and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-06-2006
was forwarded to the director general of police dgp inspector general of police igp assam by the commissioner and secretary to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAyers Vs. Belmontes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-13-2006
fact shall take into account any relevant listed factors see generally tuilaepa v california 512 u s 967 978 979 1994
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohnson Matthey India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2006
Reported in: (2007)8STT501
consultancy engineer s service seems to be quite enlarged by generously accommodating a number of activities connected to the discipline of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociation for Investment Management and Research and anr. Vs. the In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-2006
Reported in: 2006(33)PTC352(Del)
..... financial analysts or term chartered financial analysts it could not be said that marks were generic and distinctive and had not acquired any secondary meaning if defendants were allowed to continue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAstrazeneca Uk Ltd. and anr. Vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2006
Reported in: 2006(32)PTC733(Del)
..... but because both of them have prefix mero which is generic word this generic word is used not only by the parties to the ..... used in pharmaceutical industry with a common prefix derived from the generic name meropenem the defendant is entitled to use the mark ..... used in pharmaceutical industry with a common prefix derived from the generic name and so the plaintiffs can not claim exclusive rights and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial